[Numpy-discussion] Resolving the associativity/precedence debate for @

[Ralf Gommers]

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> After 88 emails we don't have a conclusion in the other thread (see
> >> [1] for background). But we have to come to some conclusion or another
> >> if we want @ to exist :-). So I'll summarize where the discussion
> >> stands and let's see if we can find some way to resolve this.
> >
> > "The numpy community has no consensus strongly preferring one option
> > over another" is a perfectly fine conclusion to this thread on
> > numpy-discussion, IMO. Actually deciding what goes into the PEP given
> > that input and merged with other concerns should probably happen on
> > python-ideas.
>
> Yep, if we converge on deadlock then that's what we'll do, but I'm not
> yet convinced that we've converged at all. In the last few hours the
> "vote" deltas are right -1, left +3...
>

If it helps, my +1 is also for left associative.

Ralf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20140323/5a1a7079/attachment.html>