[Numpy-discussion] SciPy 2014 BoF NumPy Participation

[Fernando Perez]

Hi folks,

I've just created a page on the numpy wiki:

https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Numpy-BoF-at-Scipy-2014

I'd appreciate it if people could put down on that page the title of
topics, plus a brief summary (with links to this or other relevant
threads), they'd like to see discussed.

BoFs can be very useful but they can also easily devolve into random
digressions. I'll do my best to fulfill my role as discussion facilitator
by pushing for an agenda for the discussion that can fit realistically in
the time we have, and trying to keep us on track.

It would help a lot if people put their ideas in advance, so we can
sort/refine/prioritize a little bit. Hopefully this will lead to a more
productive conversation.

Cheers

f


On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal <
chris.barker at noaa.gov> wrote:

> On Jun 27, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kyle,
> >
> >> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:40 I'd like to propose adopting something
> like the Blaze standard for datetime,
>
> +1 for some focused discussion of datetime. This has been lingering
> far too long.
>
> -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>



-- 
Fernando Perez (@fperez_org; http://fperez.org)
fperez.net-at-gmail: mailing lists only (I ignore this when swamped!)
fernando.perez-at-berkeley: contact me here for any direct mail
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20140628/b637cfbf/attachment.html>