[Numpy-discussion] numpy.mean still broken for largefloat32arrays
Alan G Isaac
alan.isaac at gmail.com
Fri Jul 25 14:00:15 EDT 2014
On 7/25/2014 1:40 PM, Eelco Hoogendoorn wrote:
> At the risk of repeating myself: explicit is better than implicit
This sounds like an argument for renaming the `mean` function `naivemean`
rather than `mean`. Whatever numpy names `mean`, shouldn't it
implement an algorithm that produces the mean? And obviously, for any
float data type, the mean value of the values in the array is representable
as a value of the same type.
Alan Isaac
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list