[Numpy-discussion] numpy.mean still broken for largefloat32arrays

Alan G Isaac alan.isaac at gmail.com
Fri Jul 25 14:00:15 EDT 2014


On 7/25/2014 1:40 PM, Eelco Hoogendoorn wrote:
> At the risk of repeating myself: explicit is better than implicit


This sounds like an argument for renaming the `mean` function `naivemean`
rather than `mean`.  Whatever numpy names `mean`, shouldn't it
implement an algorithm that produces the mean?  And obviously, for any
float data type, the mean value of the values in the array is representable
as a value of the same type.

Alan Isaac




More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list