[Numpy-discussion] Universal functions and introspection

Fernando Perez fperez.net at gmail.com
Wed Apr 16 15:50:12 EDT 2014


Does argument clinic work with python2 or is it python3 only?

http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0436/

f


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:

> I don't think the names exist currently except as mnemonics in the
> docstring. Patches to improve 'inspect' support would be welcome of
> course.
>
> -n
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Sylvain Corlay
> <sylvain.corlay at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Unfortunately, numpy ufuncs are incompatible with the inspect module.
> > While ufunc.nin and ufunc.nout provide some information on the
> signature, I
> > don't see how to retrieve argument names. What is the preferred/best way
> to
> > get argument names of a numpy ufuncs?
> > Best,
> > Sylvain
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Nathaniel J. Smith
> Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh
> http://vorpus.org
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>



-- 
Fernando Perez (@fperez_org; http://fperez.org)
fperez.net-at-gmail: mailing lists only (I ignore this when swamped!)
fernando.perez-at-berkeley: contact me here for any direct mail
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20140416/276640e8/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list