[Numpy-discussion] PEP 465 has been accepted / volunteers needed

Christophe Bal projetmbc at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 09:27:13 EDT 2014


Hello,
I really think that add a new operator @  is not a good thing.

Sorry I just want to make a joke... ;-)

Christophe BAL


2014-04-10 15:11 GMT+02:00 <josef.pktd at gmail.com>:

> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Francesc Alted <faltet at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4/9/14, 10:46 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com
> >> <mailto:njs at pobox.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>     Thank you! Though I suspect that the most important part of my
> >>     contribution may have just been my high tolerance for writing emails
> >>     ;-).
> >>
> >>
> >> no -- it's your high tolerance for _reading_ emails...
> >>
> >> Far too many of us have a high tolerance for writing them!
> >
> > Ha ha, very true!
>
> I'm trying, but it's hard.
> Sometimes avoiding the `send` button helps. I still have a collection
> of draft replies.
>
> Josef
> "I'm not going to send this reply" -- oops, did it again
>
> >
> > --
> > Francesc Alted
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20140410/7740423b/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list