[Numpy-discussion] alterNEP - was: missing data discussion round 2

[Nathaniel Smith]

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Eric Firing <efiring at hawaii.edu> wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 06:40 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Christopher Jordan-Squire
>
>> BTW, you can't access the memory of a masked value by taking a view,
>> at least if I'm reading this version of the NEP correctly, and it
>> seems to be the latest:
>>    https://github.com/m-paradox/numpy/blob/4afdb2768c4bb8cfe47c21154c4c8ca5f85e41aa/doc/neps/c-masked-array.rst
>
> No, to see the latest you need to go to pull request #99, I believe:
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/99
>  From there click the diff button, then select
> doc/neps/missing-data.rst, then "view file" to get to a formatted view
> of the whole file in its most recent form. You can also look at the
> history of the file there.  c-masked-array.rst was renamed to
> missing-data.rst and editing continued.

Oh. Thanks for the link!

Fortunately, I'm not seeing any changes that invalidate anything I've
said here. The disappearance of .validitymask changes the details of
my response earlier to Pierre, but not the content, I think. But sorry
for the confusion.

-- Nathaniel