[Numpy-discussion] NEPaNEP lessons - was: alterNEP
Jason Grout
jason-sage at creativetrax.com
Sat Jul 2 08:29:17 EDT 2011
On 7/2/11 6:54 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Why5: Because there was a belief that implementation was more
> important than discussion
I hesitate to jump into the discussion here, but it seems to me that
Mark and others were making the point that beginning implementation
*informs* the discussion in a very valuable way. In a case like this
where it seems like the differences are fundamentally based on untested
assumptions (e.g., "this would be confusing" or "the consistency would
provide greater benefits than any confusion"), it seems that having an
implementation to play around with is a very valuable thing. Release
early and often, etc.
Of course, it should also be pointed out that Mark and others are trying
to have a conference call, where (as they said it) the communication
bandwidth is greater, which hopefully would lead to more effective and
clear communication. I see that as a very responsible thing to do,
given the intensity of some of the feelings in this discussion.
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Grout
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list