[Numpy-discussion] numpydoc without autosummary
Michael Droettboom
mdroe at stsci.edu
Fri Oct 23 15:47:56 EDT 2009
Done. Issue #50.
Thanks,
Mike
On 10/23/2009 02:56 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> The proper thing to do is file an "enhancement" ticket, at:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/pydocweb/issues/list
>
> Thanks.
>
> DG
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Michael Droettboom <mdroe at stsci.edu
> <mailto:mdroe at stsci.edu>> wrote:
>
> On 10/23/2009 09:39 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> > Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:25:12 -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a way to use numpydoc without putting an autosummary
> table at
> >> the head of each class? I'm using numpydoc primarily for the
> >> sectionized docstring support, but the autosummaries are somewhat
> >> overkill for my project.
> >>
> > Ah, you meant the stuff output by default to class docstrings.
> Currently,
> > there's no way to turn this off, unfortunately. It seems there
> should be,
> > though...
> >
> >
> Exactly. It would be great if there was a conf.py option (or
> something)
> to turn this off. Thanks for considering it.
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org <mailto:NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org>
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20091023/f708fbef/attachment.html>
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list