[Numpy-discussion] datetime64

[Charles R Harris]

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:47 PM, David Cournapeau <cournape at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Pierre GM <pgmdevlist at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 19, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> >>
> >> we're starting to use these tools more and more, and with the 1.4
> >> release coming out, we're a bit lost here...
> >
> > Welcome to the club...
> > Fernando, Ariel, I'm in the same spot as you are, I haven't been able to
> use it. I don't think it's that a good idea to advertise it in the upcoming
> release notes...
>
> I am inclined to simply remove the datetime code for 1.4.0. I think
> there has been plenty of time to document it, and I would prefer
> seeing the code in 1.5.0 with the rationale rather than changing
> something between 1.4.0 and 1.5.0
>
>
When I committed the Chebyshev stuff I was thinking it would be nice to have
a "provisional" category. That is, since the code had seen little use and
feedback some features, such as defaults/names might change before the next
release.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20091119/74e98e5f/attachment.html>