[Numpy-discussion] Py3K
Ondrej Certik
ondrej at certik.cz
Wed Apr 16 10:06:29 EDT 2008
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan at sun.ac.za> wrote:
> On 16/04/2008, Fernando Perez <fperez.net at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Charles R Harris
>
> > > Oh, and making the transition will be made a lot easier by having a complete
> > > set of tests. Getting the tests and documentation into good state might be
> > > the best focus for our 1.2 effort.
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Bonus points for whoever adds coverage reporting to our test suite, so
> > that we can get at least basic metrics of coverage by:
> >
> > - docstrings
> > - doctests
> > - plain tests
>
> I'd love to see that. In the meantime, here is a figleaf coverage report:
>
> http://mentat.za.net/numpy/coverage/
Wow, figleaf is really cool. I didn't know about this tool.
Ondrej
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list