[Numpy-discussion] ScientificPython with numarray support

[Sebastian Haase]

On Thursday 13 January 2005 05:42 am, konrad.hinsen at laposte.net wrote:
> A development release of Scientific Python that supports numarray as an
> alternative to NumPy  


Hi Konrad, 
This is great news !

In the readme it says:
"""
Note that this is a new feature and not very well tested. Feedback is welcome.
Note also that the modules

  Scientific.Functions.Derivatives
  Scientific.Functions.FirstDerivatives
  Scientific.Functions.LeastSquares

do not work correctly with numarray because they rely on a feature of
Numeric that is missing in current numarray releases.
"""

I'm just curious what the missing feature is.

The LeastSquare-fit is exactly what I'm interested in, since I couldn't find 
something similar anywhere else (like: It's not in SciPy, right?)

Thanks,
Sebastian Haase







>(choice made at installation time) is now
> available at
>
> 	http://starship.python.net/~hinsen/ScientificPython/
> or
> 	http://dirac.cnrs-orleans.fr/ScientificPython/
>
> (Search for "2.51".)
>
> Note that some modules do not work under numarray because they rely on
> a NumPy feature that is currently implemented in numarray. They are
> listed in the README file.
>
> Konrad.
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Konrad Hinsen
> Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, CEA Saclay,
> 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
> Tel.: +33-1 69 08 79 25
> Fax: +33-1 69 08 82 61
> E-Mail: hinsen at llb.saclay.cea.fr
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> _______________________________________________
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Numpy-discussion at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion