[Numpy-discussion] Response to PEP suggestions
Colin J. Williams
cjw at sympatico.ca
Sat Feb 19 11:43:23 EST 2005
Timo Korvola wrote:
>"Colin J. Williams" <cjw at sympatico.ca> writes:
>
>
> [snip]
>
>
>
>>I was glad to see the proposal to abandon "ravel" ( a hangover from
>>APL?).
>>
>>
From 05-02-18 16:24 PM
Yeah, I don't like this anymore either.
I like X.flatten() better than X.ravel() too.
-Travis
I suggest that X.flatten would be even better.
>
>I thought all APL builtins were denoted by weird special characters
>rather than any readable or pronouncable names. But I don't see ravel
>actually being abandoned, as the PEP does not discuss functions much.
>One reason for preferring functions to methods and attributes is that
>functions can be made to work with scalars and generic sequences.
>
Yes, most of these weird special operators had names, one of these was
ravel. Incidentally, 'shape' is also probably inherited from Iverson's APL.
Colin W.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list