[Numpy-discussion] Status of Numeric
verveer at embl.de
verveer at embl.de
Tue Jan 20 12:38:02 EST 2004
Just my 2 cents on the issue of replacing Numeric by Numarray:
I was under the impression that Numarray was intended to be a replacement for
Numeric, also as a building block for larger packages such as SciPy. Was
Numarray not intended to be an "improved Numeric" in the first place? I chose
to develop for Numarray rather than Numeric because of its improvements, under
the assumption that eventually my code would also become available to the
users of such packages as SciPy. (I wrote the nd_image extension that is now
distributed with Numarray. I also contributed some improvements to RandomArray
extension that are not in the Numeric version.)
I believe that it would be a bad situation if the numerical python community
would be split among two different array packages. (I think Paul Dubois
expressed a similar sentiment on comp.lang.python). Supporting code for two
incompatible packages would be a pain (I am personally not willing to do
that). Not being able to use modules designed for one package in the other
would be disappointing for many people, I think...
If I understood well, the only issue with Numarray seems to be that the speed
for handling small arrays is too low. So would it not be more efficient to
focus on that problem rather than throwing away all the excellent work that
has been done already on Numarray?
Best regards, Peter
--
Dr. Peter J. Verveer
Cell Biology and Cell Biophysics Programme
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Meyerhofstrasse 1
D-69117 Heidelberg
Germany
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list