[New-bugs-announce] [issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set
Neil Girdhar
report at bugs.python.org
Sat Feb 12 06:15:48 EST 2022
New submission from Neil Girdhar <mistersheik at gmail.com>:
class C:
@property
def f(self) -> int:
return 2
class D(C):
pass
D().f = 2
Gives:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/neil/src/cmm/a.py", line 10, in <module>
D().f = 2
AttributeError: can't set attribute 'f'
This can be a pain to debug when the property is buried in a base class. Would it make sense to mention the reason why the attribute can't be set, namely that it's on a property without a setter?
----------
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 413122
nosy: NeilGirdhar
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set
versions: Python 3.11
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46730>
_______________________________________
More information about the New-bugs-announce
mailing list