[New-bugs-announce] [issue32590] Proposal: add an "ensure(arg)" builtin for parameter validation

[Nick Coghlan]

New submission from Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>:

This proposal is an outcome of repeated requests on python-ideas that assert statements be made unconditional, so they can be legitimately used for parameter validation, rather than solely as a form of inline self-test.

Rather than changing the assert statement, an alternative option would be to provide a new builtin (suggested name: "ensure") that raises ValidationError (a new subclass of AssertionError) if the first argument is false.

As a function, the new builtin could accept parameters for:

- the message to be reported on failure
- the exception type to be raised on failure

And since it would only be a new builtin rather than a new keyword, existing uses of the name "ensure" would be unaffected (except to the extent that linters may start warning about shadowing a builtin).

(Since it's a suggestion for a new builtin, actually doing this would require a PEP, which I'm not planning to write, I just wanted to get the suggestion explicitly on the record rather than leaving it buried in mailing list archives)

----------
messages: 310219
nosy: ncoghlan
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: needs patch
status: open
title: Proposal: add an "ensure(arg)" builtin for parameter validation
type: enhancement

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32590>
_______________________________________