[New-bugs-announce] [issue13981] time.sleep() should use nanosleep() if available

STINNER Victor report at bugs.python.org
Fri Feb 10 00:00:34 CET 2012


New submission from STINNER Victor <victor.stinner at haypocalc.com>:

With the PEP 410, it is possible to store timestamps with a resolution of 1 nanosecond. Python should use nanosleep() if the function is available for time.sleep().

This issue depends on issue #13882.

----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 153000
nosy: haypo
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: time.sleep() should use nanosleep() if available
versions: Python 3.3

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13981>
_______________________________________


More information about the New-bugs-announce mailing list