[New-bugs-announce] [issue7213] Popen.subprocess change close_fds default to True

Milko Krachounov report at bugs.python.org
Tue Oct 27 00:14:02 CET 2009


New submission from Milko Krachounov <python at milko.3mhz.net>:

Currently, close_fds defaults to False. The are few cases in which one
would want to leave the fds open, in all the rest leaving them open can
lead to unpleasant side effects. For example, the following doesn't work:

>>> p1 = Popen(['cat'], stdin=PIPE, stdout=PIPE)
>>> p2 = Popen(['grep', 'a'], stdin=p1.stdout, stdout=PIPE)
>>> p1.stdin.write("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa\n")
>>> p1.stdin.close()
>>> p2.stdout.read()

It would block forever, and it is not obvious that p1.stdin remains
open, because p2 was created without close_fds=True. On the other hand,
in each and every case where close_fds=True is required, the programmer
is aware that he needs to leave some fds open (and usually knows which fds).

The current default is harmful, because in each case where the file
descriptors are not explicitly needed in the child process, they can
cause problems hard to debug. It seems that only about 10% of the
current uses of Popen have close_fds=True.

I propose that the close_fds default is changed to True. Alternatively,
this could be combined with bug #6559 by completely removing the
close_fds argument, and leaving only pass_fds, which could accept
subprocess.ALL_FDS as a value.

There are two issues with my proposal:
1. close_fds would have to be changed to give a warning each time it is
not specified before the change of the default can be adopted. Otherwise
it would break any programs relying on close_fds being False by default.
2. Closing fds has a slight performance impact.

However, I think that close_fds=True is much more sensible default. I
think it will be a good idea if at least py3k adopts the change.

----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 94538
nosy: milko.krachounov
severity: normal
status: open
title: Popen.subprocess change close_fds default to True
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7213>
_______________________________________


More information about the New-bugs-announce mailing list