From rb.proj at googlemail.com Sun Mar 17 17:13:09 2013 From: rb.proj at googlemail.com (Reimar Bauer) Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 22:13:09 +0100 Subject: [Moin-user] moin-1.9.7 released Message-ID: This release is mostly about improving password security and password-related functionality. For details see: http://hg.moinmo.in/moin/1.9/raw-file/1.9.7/docs/CHANGES See http://moinmo.in/MoinMoinDownload for the release archive. BTW, for future moin 1.9 releases, we still need many more people helping with maintaining and updating translations on http://master.moinmo.in/ . So, especially if you speak some non-english language, you can help! See http://moinmo.in/MoinDev/Translation for details. These days we spent most of our time on developing moin2, see http://moinmo.in/MoinMoin2.0 for details. If you like to hack / test new stuff, have a look! Also feel invited to help with it, so it gets ready for production sooner. If you are interested in helping, feel free to contact us on IRC chat, see: http://moinmo.in/MoinMoinChat From xerofun at gmx.li Mon Mar 18 09:49:31 2013 From: xerofun at gmx.li (xerofun) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:49:31 +0100 Subject: [Moin-user] MoinMoin version number not updating in footer Message-ID: <51471B6B.80805@gmx.li> Hi, I had to dig this from the archives, as I didn't find my original mail to reply to it. After updating from 1.9.4 to 1.9.7 I still see the 1.9.4 in the footer. Just like with the other update from 1.9.3 to 1.9.4. None of the following actions changed anything: Apache restart, clearing the cache I checked all /usr/lib/python*.* directories and no other MoinMoin directories are present. # find /usr/lib/ -name "MoinMoin" /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MoinMoin I also switched to mod-wsgi after you suggested it. All sys.path.insert() statements I changed and I was able to find, point to my configuration directory. Where could the old version number be cached? It has to be somewhere right? >> first of all, thanks for that great wiki software. > > :) > >> I just updated two wikis on two different servers from 1.9.3 to 1.9.4. >> >> With "show_version = True" > > BTW, you can also just visit SystemInfo page (if you installed it). > >> one server is correctly showing "MoinMoin Release 1.9.4" in the page >> footer. The other keeps showing "MoinMoin Release 1.9.3", altough I definetly used >> moin-1.9.4.tar.gz. Also /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MoinMoin/version.py shows the correct version. >> > > Maybe there is some other moin installation at some other place in > sys.path. Or you have old *.pyc files (just guessing, not sure if it > would use them if there are newer *.py files). > >> I'm using moin.cgi with Apache. /usr/bin/env python returns Python 2.6.6. There are no old libraries >> installed anywhere. >> >> I also tried to remove /usr/share/moin and /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MoinMoin thus >> reinstalling all core parts of moinmoin, but still no change. I use the standard modern theme, so >> this is definetly not an issue of a hardcoded version number. >> >> Any hints on what could be wrong? > > Well, I would look into the server adaptor script (moin.cgi maybe in > your case, but better double check in your apache configuration / URL). > > Often there are some sys.path.insert() statements that setup the python > search path. Just look into those directories, whether there is some > MoinMoin/ subdirectory there. > > Also check whether it is really using python 2.6 for cgi (see the first > line of the script). Maybe you also have some newer or older python on > your system and it is using that (and the site-packages directory > there). > > BTW, after solving that issue, maybe try to migrate to mod-wsgi (and > moin.wsgi). It is relatively easy, much faster and using less disk I/O. > > WSGI is nowadays the standard way to run python web stuff. From rb.proj at googlemail.com Wed Mar 20 12:19:58 2013 From: rb.proj at googlemail.com (Reimar Bauer) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:19:58 +0100 Subject: [Moin-user] MoinMoin version number not updating in footer In-Reply-To: <51471B6B.80805@gmx.li> References: <51471B6B.80805@gmx.li> Message-ID: Hi Am 18.03.2013 14:49, schrieb xerofun: > Hi, > > I had to dig this from the archives, as I didn't find my original mail to reply to it. > > After updating from 1.9.4 to 1.9.7 I still see the 1.9.4 in the footer. Just like with the other > update from 1.9.3 to 1.9.4. None of the following actions changed anything: Apache restart, clearing > the cache > > I checked all /usr/lib/python*.* directories and no other MoinMoin directories are present. > > # find /usr/lib/ -name "MoinMoin" > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MoinMoin > > I also switched to mod-wsgi after you suggested it. > > All sys.path.insert() statements I changed and I was able to find, point to my configuration directory. > > Where could the old version number be cached? It has to be somewhere right? > > > >>> first of all, thanks for that great wiki software. >> >> :) >> >>> I just updated two wikis on two different servers from 1.9.3 to 1.9.4. >>> >>> With "show_version = True" >> >> BTW, you can also just visit SystemInfo page (if you installed it). >> >>> one server is correctly showing "MoinMoin Release 1.9.4" in the page >>> footer. The other keeps showing "MoinMoin Release 1.9.3", altough I definetly used >>> moin-1.9.4.tar.gz. Also /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MoinMoin/version.py shows the correct version. >>> where in the footer do you see it, can you show an image or the url ? What does SystemInfo page tell What do you get by $python >>> from MoinMoin import version >>> print version.release Reimar >> >> Maybe there is some other moin installation at some other place in >> sys.path. Or you have old *.pyc files (just guessing, not sure if it >> would use them if there are newer *.py files). >> >>> I'm using moin.cgi with Apache. /usr/bin/env python returns Python 2.6.6. There are no old libraries >>> installed anywhere. >>> >>> I also tried to remove /usr/share/moin and /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MoinMoin thus >>> reinstalling all core parts of moinmoin, but still no change. I use the standard modern theme, so >>> this is definetly not an issue of a hardcoded version number. >>> >>> Any hints on what could be wrong? >> >> Well, I would look into the server adaptor script (moin.cgi maybe in >> your case, but better double check in your apache configuration / URL). >> >> Often there are some sys.path.insert() statements that setup the python >> search path. Just look into those directories, whether there is some >> MoinMoin/ subdirectory there. >> >> Also check whether it is really using python 2.6 for cgi (see the first >> line of the script). Maybe you also have some newer or older python on >> your system and it is using that (and the site-packages directory >> there). >> >> BTW, after solving that issue, maybe try to migrate to mod-wsgi (and >> moin.wsgi). It is relatively easy, much faster and using less disk I/O. >> >> WSGI is nowadays the standard way to run python web stuff. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar > From harikripas at gmail.com Tue Mar 26 05:31:33 2013 From: harikripas at gmail.com (hari k) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:31:33 +0800 Subject: [Moin-user] Looking for a better template in the subscription e-mail Message-ID: Dear All , Is there way to change the subscription mail template . I am looking for something more friendly and easy to understand the changes . So that somebody make some changes in the post then the subscribed users will get a friendly notification . Currently its showing diff output and its not easy to understand the non techie people . Is there a way to get a colored diff output , just like git diff . Any idea ? -- Thanks & Regards, -------------- Hari.K -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tw at waldmann-edv.de Tue Mar 26 07:25:04 2013 From: tw at waldmann-edv.de (Thomas Waldmann) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:25:04 +0100 Subject: [Moin-user] Looking for a better template in the subscription e-mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <51518590.6020506@waldmann-edv.de> > Is there way to change the subscription mail template . Not easily. > I am looking for something more friendly and easy to understand the > changes . So that somebody make some changes in the post then the > subscribed users will get a friendly notification . > > Currently its showing diff output and its not easy to understand the non > techie people . Is there a way to get a colored diff output , just like > git diff . For the web UI, we have some html diff code, that does this. But we do not send HTML emails. BUT, there is a link to that html diff view inside the text email, you just need to click on it. Also, some people dislike HTML emails or maybe even can handle the coloured stuff worse than the "techie" diff stuff. So we would need another user setting for this preference? Or send multipart email with text AND html? Considering that moin 1.9.x is stable, I only see room for rather small changes / contributions, but you can help to make moin2 better by helping to think about such stuff (on a rather detailled level) and/or contribute some code that implements it. From jkwight at gmail.com Sun Mar 31 14:17:02 2013 From: jkwight at gmail.com (Jim Wight) Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 19:17:02 +0100 Subject: [Moin-user] SeeSaw macro future In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 17 January 2013 12:46, Jim Wight wrote: > Anyone interested in taking over development/maintenance of my SeeSaw > macro? > > I retired over 3 years ago, and although I kept up my interest in SeeSaw > for a while - I produced another release and worked on correcting some > deficiencies with it - my enthusiasm has been dwindling for some time. I > used to religiously check SeeSaw against new releases of MoinMoin and > jQuery but I've allowed several to slip past lately. > > Further, as my ex-work login that I used for development and maintaining > the demonstration site seesaw.ncl.ac.uk is up for renewal at the end of > this month, and as the conditions for continuation are more stringent this > time, I've decided not to bother trying to make a case and am going to > allow it to lapse. That site will be withdrawn at the same time. > > Therefore, I won't be working on SeeSaw any more and would welcome someone > taking it over. I will, of course, be happy to help whoever that might be > to understand it. > > Having written that, I found my interest in SeeSaw returning. Since then I've dusted down a new version I'd prepared but which had lain unreleased for over a year. It was to fix a bug, but I wasn't entirely happy with my overly-complicated resolution, so kept holding off releasing it. I'm glad I did, as on reflection I've decided that the bug wasn't a bug after all but a matter of interpretation of behaviour. Nevertheless, I've decided to put out a new release because I'd also made what I thought were worthwhile improvements; it is available from MacroMarket. There's one minor feature addition, but a change in the generated HTML has led to a simplification (and near 50% reduction) of the JavaScript code, which now allows SeeSaw to be applied to any HTML element, e.g. to tables through MoinMoin markup (using tableclass, rowclass and class). Further, I've taken the examples that were available at http://seesaw.ncl.ac.uk, revised them and bundled them into a set of ready-to-use pages that can be slotted into any wiki. They can be downloaded from SeeSaw's MacroMarket page. When I ran t he demonstration site, I used to check SeeSaw against all versions of MoinMoin from 1.6, but only because that was the version in use at my workplace when I started it. I no longer see a need for that to be done. Therefore, as it doesn't seem such an onerous task to check against future releases of MoinMoin and jQuery using my own setup, which I've just done with 1.9.7 and 1.9.1 respectively, I'm reversing my decision and will continue to keep a watching brief. I don't have plans for any more development; maybe SeeSaw has too many features as it is. Jim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: