[meta-sig] encryptioin/compression sig
Jeremy Hylton
jeremy@alum.mit.edu
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 16:19:26 -0500 (EST)
>>>>> "PCD" == PC Drew <drewpc@colorado.edu> writes:
PCD> Okay, so I've been using Python for about a year now and the
PCD> more I use it the more I really like it (doing without ++ and
PCD> -- is kinda hard, but I'll get by!). One thing that I've
PCD> noticed is that there isn't a real big interest in compression
PCD> or encryption. I notice this because there aren't any modules
PCD> (or a small amount) that do this!
The number is small but not zero. Some of the packages that exist
provide a large collection of encryption algorithms.
PCD> I'm proposing a SIG that will encompass both cryptography and
PCD> compression libraries in a clean API so that users can
PCD> encrypt/decrypt or compress/decompress files or strings easily.
PCD> In addition to creating the APIs, also wrapping C libraries of
PCD> many of the popular algorithms.
I don't see that there is a need for a sig to accomplish. I also
wonder if much of what you propose isn't already done. Have you
looked at, for instance, mxCrypto/amkCrypto or M2Crypto?
(The latter is at http://www.post1.com/home/ngps/m2.)
PCD> Feedback? If people are interested (or not adverse to it),
PCD> then I'll draft up a formal proposal with a name, description,
PCD> and the like.
If you have time to do work on crypto stuff, why don't you raise the
issue on python-crytpo@egroups.com and see what needs the people there
identify? There is no need to reinvent the wheel, but there is lots
of opportunity for someone to contribute.
Jeremy