[meta-sig] PROPOSAL: Python Scarecrow SIG

[Jim Fulton]

"Barry A. Warsaw" wrote:
> 
> I'm surprised no one else has followed up to Jim's message, so I guess
> I'll be the first.
> 
> Obviously I support creating a sig to address these issues.  In
> talking with some people, I've heard rumblings about creating a
> super-sig that will attack 1) the interfaces issue; 2) the class/type
> split; 3) static typing.
> 
> My own thoughts are that I'd like to keep the discussions separate
> because I think we'll be more productive attacking each issue in a
> separate forum.  In reality though, if we do that, it is highly likely
> that the core contributors to the discussion will be subscribed to all
> three lists.  That path leads to cross-posting such that they might as
> well be one list (and having 3 separate lists will just be confusing).

I prefer to keep the discussions separate.  For one thing, the interface sig
has tasks with a much shorter time frame.  I also think mixing the discussions
will tend to bog things down.  I don't have a problem with an occasional
crost post.

But, whatever.  :)

Jim

--
Jim Fulton           mailto:jim@digicool.com
Technical Director   (888) 344-4332              Python Powered!
Digital Creations    http://www.digicool.com     http://www.python.org

Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission.  Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for
repeats.