[meta-sig] Poll: how to coordinate XML efforts
Barry A. Warsaw
bwarsaw@CNRI.Reston.Va.US (Barry A. Warsaw)
Thu, 12 Mar 1998 12:00:49 -0500 (EST)
>>>>> "RF" == Robin Friedrich <friedrich@pythonpros.com> writes:
I'm not religious on any of the choices, but my preferences would be
RF> 4) Create the XML-sig tightly focused on the XML/Python
RF> issues.
Since the Unicode work seems to be firing up the string-sig of late,
it might be better to split the two technical tracks up. An xml-sig
with a narrow focus, hard deliverables, and known termination criteria
seems like the right approach to me.
web-sig is less appropriate since XML has usefulness outside the Web
community.
doc-sig is less appropriate because we're not (yet) talking about how
to convert or write new Python documentation in XML.
Feel free (anyone) to volunteer your championhood and write up a
mission statement.
<http://www.python.org/sigs/guidelines.html>
-Barry