[MATRIX-SIG] reverse of take?
Phil Austin
phil@geog.ubc.ca
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 16:24:44 -0700
>>>>> "AM" == Andrew P Mullhaupt <amullhau@ix.netcom.com> writes:
AM> This kind of scatter
AM> is really neat and one of the attractions of the S language. S
AM> has by far the nicest syntax for indexing of all the array
AM> languages, and it is the language closest to Python in terms
AM> of object-orientation and argument syntax. Note that although
AM> S is normally very slow compared to Python, the fact that
AM> powerful array indexing is implemented at the "C" level makes
AM> up for a lot of lost ground.
AM> This could easily be added to NumPy (along with a couple of
AM> other really useful forms of indexing). The long history of
AM> successful use of the highly flexible indexing in S is a
AM> 'proof of concept'.
One thing that would be a helpful teaching tool, and a useful part of
a motivating sales pitch for S indexing, would be a concordance
giving a variety of index constructs in S, Matlab, Mathematica, etc., and
their python equivalents. I would volunteer to collate such a list if
people wanted to make submissions. At the moment I'm trying to
translate various legacy S constructs into take, repeat, reduce
combinations--it feels like I'm taking (and failing) some kind of IQ
test.
Phil
_______________
MATRIX-SIG - SIG on Matrix Math for Python
send messages to: matrix-sig@python.org
administrivia to: matrix-sig-request@python.org
_______________