[PYTHON MATRIX-SIG] FFT question

[Konrad Hinsen]

> inverse_real_fft isn't in the documentation yet, but if you replace Fourier
> transform with inverse-Fourier transform you'll have it's docs.

So inverse_real_fft should do the inverse of real_fft, right? That's not
what it does at the moment.

> Note: These function are both available for efficiency only.  There is no reason
> that you can't use the ordinary fft function on an array of reals.  The result you
> get back will be much easier to deal with.

Of course, and I am not planning to use them. I am just preparing the next
part of my Python tutorial, which will cover linear algebra, FFT, etc.
I guess I'll just say nothing about real FFTs!

Konrad.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen                          | E-Mail: hinsen@ibs.ibs.fr
Laboratoire de Dynamique Moleculaire   | Tel.: +33-4.76.88.99.28
Institut de Biologie Structurale       | Fax:  +33-4.76.88.54.94
41, av. des Martyrs                    | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/
38027 Grenoble Cedex 1, France         | Nederlands/Francais
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________
MATRIX-SIG  - SIG on Matrix Math for Python

send messages to: matrix-sig@python.org
administrivia to: matrix-sig-request@python.org
_______________