[PYTHON MATRIX-SIG] Open Issues (packages, umath, ...)
David Ascher
da@maigret.cog.brown.edu
Fri, 20 Sep 1996 11:45:37 -0400 (EDT)
> 1) umath
>
> I've decided to be reasonable on this issue (well, I guess I just got
> intimidated by all the knowledgable people who disagreed with me). Here's
> my current proposal:
>
> Numeric will do "import umath". Note: it will not do "from umath import
> *".
>
> This means that the safe version of the math functions will be used by
> default. On the other hand, you won't be able to type: Numeric.log(1.0)
> anymore, this will now look like Numeric.umath.log(1.0) [or any other way
> you care to import this module into your namespace].
>
> If you want to change the functions used internally by Numeric, you can
> just do Numeric.umath = fast_umath (I hope this actually works...).
>
> I think this scheme makes sense and should make most everybody happy.
Ugh. It seems cumbersome in 95% of cases -- in other words, a given
user is likely to want either umath or fast_umath most of the time.
Having to type .umath every time seems user-unfriendly.
Is there a setup which would let people do:
import Numeric
Numeric.log(1.0) [referring to Numeric.umath.log]
Numeric.makeFast()
Numeric.log(1.0) [referring to Numeric.fast_umath.log]
Numeric.makeSafe()
Numeric.log(1.0) [referring to Numeric.umath.log]
[with the .umath and .fast_umath ways still being there in case people
want .umath.log and .fast_umath.exp]
Alternatively:
import Numeric
Numeric.log(1.0) [referring to Numeric.umath.log]
import FastNumeric
Numeric = FastNumeric
Numeric.log(1.0) [referring to Numeric.fast_umath.log]
import SafeNumeric
Numeric = SafeNumeric
Numeric.log(1.0) [referring to Numeric.umath.log]
Or some such variant?
--david
=================
MATRIX-SIG - SIG on Matrix Math for Python
send messages to: matrix-sig@python.org
administrivia to: matrix-sig-request@python.org
=================