[Mailman-Developers] Possible bug in marilman arch when doing incremental archiving

[fc lists]

Thanks a lot for this :)

I will take a look at your fix and most likely import that in my mailman
package ... other then anything, i would prefer to have something mantained
upstream so i don't have to patch my package every time i upgrade.




On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> wrote:

> On 12/13/2013 02:57 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the report. I have created
> > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1260883> for this issue.
> >
> > I think your fix is OK, but I am inclined to set the factory while
> > skipping to the start to Mailman.Mailbox._safeparser rather than the
> > default just in case one of the skipped messages throws
> MessageParseError.
>
>
> I have committed a fix. I fixed this in a way that is probably different
> from what you did because I didn't want to import private
> Mailman.Mailbox functions into Mailman/Archiver/pipermail.py.
>
> See
> <http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mailman-coders/mailman/2.1/revision/1440>
> for my fix.
>
> --
> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan
> _______________________________________________
> Mailman-Developers mailing list
> Mailman-Developers at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
> Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
> Searchable Archives:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/fclists%40pr-z.info
>
> Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
>