[Mailman-Developers] dkim-signature headers
John W. Baxter
jwblist3 at olympus.net
Thu Feb 8 23:55:37 CET 2007
On 2/8/07 10:27 AM, "Barry Warsaw" <barry at python.org> wrote:
> Me too. Here's my discussion on the topic, including a concrete
> proposal for Mailman 2.1.10 and 2.2/3.0. Feel free to comment on the
> wiki on in this thread.
>
> http://wiki.list.org/x/OgM
>
Looks good to me.
" IOW, a valid signed List-ID header should be indication enough that all
other signatures were subject to breakage because of mailing list garbling"
Probably should be "...all prior signatures..." not "...other...".
---
Since the public key for a DKIM signature comes from DNS (as I understand
it), an administrative detail is that a mailing list operator has to provide
for the key's existence in order for Mailman's attempt to sign to be
effective.
--John
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list