[Mailman-Developers] On-topic-ness for -users and -dev
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sat Dec 17 18:45:45 CET 2005
>>>>> "JC" == JC Dill <lists05 at equinephotoart.com> writes:
JC> The posts we are hoping to keep OFF of -dev and ON -users are
JC> the posts by users who are having what they believe are
JC> "complicated" use problems and they want "advanced support"
[...]
JC> As long as the topic brought here is about *how* to develop a
JC> new feature, I believe it's on-topic for -dev.
+1. And good job of presenting, at that. FAQ material?
JC> [1] Does it belong in the headers, the footer, the body?
JC> Should it be a configuration option to place it in one or more
JC> of these locations? What happens when the button (or link) is
JC> clicked? What if non-spam is reported? What about RFCs?
JC> Etc.
Niggle: these questions are appropriate for -developers, but should
also be polled on -users.
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list