[Mailman-Developers] Bug priorities (for 2.1.3)?
Bob Puff at NLE
bob at nleaudio.com
Thu Oct 2 09:47:54 EDT 2003
Where is your fix for this bug?
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de>
To: mailman-developers at python.org
Sent: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:22:19 +0200
Subject: [Mailman-Developers] Bug priorities (for 2.1.3)?
> Congratulation for getting 2.1.3 out of the door!
>
> I have a question and a remark regarding the handling of bugs:
>
> * What attributes do bugs need to get into the next release
> when a fix is available. As announced on the 14th of August to this
> list I fixed a priority 7 bug and did not receive feedback on it.
> Is there a special reason why it wasn't included in the 2.1.3 release?
> [ 665732 ] List-Id should be one line.
>
> * There is a very annoying bug (reproduced with 2.1.2, 2.1.3 test
> scheduled) in environments where people sign their emails,
> because Mailman breaks the signature.
>
> [ 815297 ] Breaking signatures in message/rfc822 attachement!
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=815297&group_id=103&atid=100103
>
> I suggest raising the priority of this bug,
> because it might give Mailman a bad reputation with
> security aware people.
> And once established such an image is hard to loose again.
>
> Cheers,
> Bernhard
>
> --
> Professional Service for Free Software
> (intevation.net) The FreeGIS Project
> (freegis.org) Association for a Free Informational
> Infrastructure (ffii.org) FSF Europe
> (fsfeurope.org)
------- End of Original Message -------
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list