[Mailman-Developers] Modifications to msg
J C Lawrence
claw@kanga.nu
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:12:54 -0800
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:28:59 -0800
John W Baxter <John> wrote:
> (Unlimited reply to headers sounds like a great way to get a Spam
> multiplier effect, but that wasn't a consideration at RFC writing
> time.)
RFC 2822 explicitly states that Reply-To can contain a list of
headers. RFC 822 is more ambiguous. To my mind this single fact (if
used with Reply-To aggregation) obviates most of the arguments in the
Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful document.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw@kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.