[Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

[Slide]

This is in the post 2.7.5 timeframe, correct? We don't want to do this
before that is released?


On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jeff Hardy <jdhardy at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Slide <slide.o.mix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I could write a tool to do that too...screen scraping is actually kind of
>> fun.
>>
>
> I would say you're a sick, twisted individual, but I get unreasonable joy
> out of forcing cmd.exe and MSBuild to do what I want, so I'll remain
> silent. :)
>
>
>> My initial plan was just to implement vote and date filters in my current
>> tool that ports issues over, but closing things is fine with me too.
>>
>
> Closing isn't a big deal; one thing the CodePlex site does well is let you
> bulk-update 100 tickets at a time.
>
> My thought is to close them all with a message similar to Keith's
> suggestion and then leave one open issue redirecting people to the GH
> issues page.
>
> - Jeff
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Keith Rome <rome at wintellect.com> wrote:
>>
>>>   IMO it is fine to lose them. I think codeplex automatically notifies
>>> you if an issue you opened has been closed (even if it is years later), so
>>> perhaps just going through and closing all of the < 2 vote or old issues
>>> with a notice that says "open a new issue on github if this is still
>>> relevant" would be enough to catch the things that fall through the cracks.
>>>
>>>
>>>   *Keith Rome*
>>>
>>> *Principal Architect @ Wintellect (www.wintellect.com
>>> <http://www.wintellect.com>)*
>>>
>>> 770.617.4016 | krome at wintellect.com <rome at wintellect.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Register today <https://www.wintellectnow.com/Account/Promo/ROME-13> for
>>> access to our high-quality on-demand training resources!
>>>
>>>
>>>   From: Jeff Hardy <jdhardy at gmail.com>
>>> Date: Friday, March 21, 2014 at 9:39 AM
>>> To: Slide <slide.o.mix at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: "ironpython-users at python.org" <ironpython-users at python.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3
>>> Update)
>>>
>>>   On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Slide <slide.o.mix at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think if you do > 1 vote, you'll miss a lot of issues that are valid,
>>> but
>>> it would provide for a cleaner slate to begin with on GitHub. There are a
>>> LOT of issues on CodePlex that are leftover from the MS days (internal
>>> bug
>>> tracker migration) that would be really nice to get rid of since we don't
>>> have the infrastructure to replicate them. I'm up for anything, just
>>> need to
>>> update my tool to add date and vote filtering if we decide to go that
>>> route.
>>>
>>>
>>>  Yeah, we're going to lose some good, actionable issues, but I think
>>> it's acceptable. The 1000+ issues currently open are just too many to
>>> do anything useful with. I'm curious to see how many issues we would
>>> be talking about with the given criteria - around 250 would be good,
>>> but that's just a gut feeling.
>>>
>>>  - Jeff
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ironpython-users mailing list
>>> Ironpython-users at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ironpython-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Website: http://earl-of-code.com
>>
>
>


-- 
Website: http://earl-of-code.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20140321/6bde4aee/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 529A2558-817C-467F-8E7E-0789B90D675C[9].png
Type: image/png
Size: 6285 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20140321/6bde4aee/attachment.png>