[Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249

[Slide]

I was planning on making it an option to load assemblies, the current
behavior would be the default. I am thinking it would be best to leave
as-is though. Either that, or allow passing in assemblies to CreateEngine
to add references to.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Dino Viehland <dinov at microsoft.com> wrote:

>  I’m fine w/ either, but if it’s an option it should be an option which
> disables adding the references for scenarios like Markus wants (otherwise
> there really is no reason to do it).****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ironpython-users-bounces+dinov=microsoft.com at python.org [mailto:
> ironpython-users-bounces+dinov=microsoft.com at python.org] *On Behalf Of *
> Slide
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:02 PM
> *To:* ironpython-users at python.org
> *Subject:* [Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249****
>
> ** **
>
> I'd like to get the thoughts of the community on work item 19249 [1]. I am
> thinking we want to either make it an option, or just leave it as is. I
> prefer the latter.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> ** **
>
> slide****
>
> ** **
>
> [1] http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/19249
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Website: http://earl-of-code.com****
>



-- 
Website: http://earl-of-code.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20120214/b9f511a7/attachment.html>