[IronPython] Meaning of issue tracker fields (Was: Working towards IronPython 2.7 RTM)

Slide slide.o.mix at gmail.com
Fri Jan 21 16:55:11 CET 2011


On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Jeff Hardy <jdhardy at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Slide <slide.o.mix at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Would be nice if we could tag issues in the issue tracker with "for 2.7"
> or
> > something similar so people could know which issues were on the docket
> for
> > including in 2.7. This might help people who want to contribute to do so.
>
> I've been thinking about this as well. I don't know what the Release
> field is supposed to mean; I could see it being either 'bug found in
> this release' or 'bug (to be) fixed in this release'.
>
> I think we should take the latter interpretation and set Release to
> 2.7 for the stuff we want to fix, and then use the 'Impact' field to
> determine what's actually going to be fixed. The main reason is that
> it makes searching for release-blocking bugs much easier.
>
> - Jeff
> _______________________________________________
>

This sounds great. Just need to make sure only certain people can mark
something as "bug (to be) fixed in this release" field so random people
don't just start marking things as going to be fixed in 2.7 :-)

slide

-- 
slide-o-blog
http://slide-o-blog.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20110121/887e0770/attachment.html>


More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list