[IronPython] no compile page model question

Pablo Dalmazzo pablodalma93 at hotmail.com
Mon Dec 6 12:11:35 CET 2010


I was just reading about that you said here http://www.asp.net/dynamiclanguages/whitepaperI was trying to figure out if we can dll the asp.net code files without the workarounds we use now
> Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 16:45:34 +0200
> From: empirebuilder at gmail.com
> To: users at lists.ironpython.com
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] no compile page model question
> 
> I think it's because the Codedomprovider that asp.net relies on cannot
> be implemented in ironpython.
> 
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Pablo Dalmazzo
> <pablodalma93 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm missing a big part of the picture so forgive me if this question doesnt
> > make any sense to you.
> > In C#, VB.NET, etc the code behind in asp.net page is defined inside a
> > class. Is there any relation between
> > IronPython code doesn't get compiled to normal .NET code where you'd have a
> > class at the IL level for each class you have at the source level, and
> > asp.net with IronPython using the no compile page model?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at lists.ironpython.com
> > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> nomadlife.org
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20101206/2b7d7417/attachment.html>


More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list