[IronPython] Thread local storage in IronPython 2.6

Michael Foord fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Mon Oct 5 22:58:55 CEST 2009


Dino Viehland wrote:
> Are you using thread abort for anything?
>
>   
Yes. Recalculations can be interrupted which uses Thread.Abort (the 
interrupt can happen during arbitrary user code so it is essentially 
asynchronous).

Michael

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-
>> bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
>> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 1:39 PM
>> To: Discussion of IronPython
>> Subject: Re: [IronPython] Thread local storage in IronPython 2.6
>>
>> Dino Viehland wrote:
>>     
>>> Michael wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Well, yes leaking memory when frames are on would definitely be a
>>>> problem. We tried but failed to create  a minimal repro.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Do you know how big the lists of FunctionStack's were?  In theory
>>> they should have all been empty lists by the time the threads
>>> exited.
>>>
>>>       
>> It had 6 entries.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>     
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.ironpython.com
>>> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
>> http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.ironpython.com
>> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>   


-- 
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog





More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list