[IronPython] Thread local storage in IronPython 2.6
Michael Foord
fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Mon Oct 5 22:58:55 CEST 2009
Dino Viehland wrote:
> Are you using thread abort for anything?
>
>
Yes. Recalculations can be interrupted which uses Thread.Abort (the
interrupt can happen during arbitrary user code so it is essentially
asynchronous).
Michael
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-
>> bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
>> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 1:39 PM
>> To: Discussion of IronPython
>> Subject: Re: [IronPython] Thread local storage in IronPython 2.6
>>
>> Dino Viehland wrote:
>>
>>> Michael wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Well, yes leaking memory when frames are on would definitely be a
>>>> problem. We tried but failed to create a minimal repro.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Do you know how big the lists of FunctionStack's were? In theory
>>> they should have all been empty lists by the time the threads
>>> exited.
>>>
>>>
>> It had 6 entries.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.ironpython.com
>>> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
>> http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.ironpython.com
>> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>
--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
More information about the Ironpython-users
mailing list