[IronPython] Issue 22239 closed as 'by design'
Michael Foord
fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Fri Jul 17 23:27:10 CEST 2009
Curt Hagenlocher wrote:
> I believe this was fixed for 2.6, but that the fix is too disruptive
> to backport (by a long shot!)
Ah - so it is just the backport that is closed. Fair enough. Sorry for
the noise.
Michael
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Michael Foord
> <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk <mailto:fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk>> wrote:
>
> Issue 22239 has been closed as 'by design'.
>
> http://ironpython.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=22239&ProjectName=IronPython
> <http://ironpython.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=22239&ProjectName=IronPython>
>
> Dino described this as a serious bug when it was pointed out and
> it is both extremely unintuitive and problematic - why should
> separate scopes (modules) be linked this way when used from the
> hosting API?
>
> This seems like a very odd decision.
>
> All the best,
>
> Michael Foord
>
> --
> http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
> http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com <mailto:Users at lists.ironpython.com>
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>
--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
More information about the Ironpython-users
mailing list