[IronPython] Issue 22239 closed as 'by design'

Michael Foord fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Fri Jul 17 23:27:10 CEST 2009


Curt Hagenlocher wrote:
> I believe this was fixed for 2.6, but that the fix is too disruptive 
> to backport (by a long shot!)
Ah - so it is just the backport that is closed. Fair enough. Sorry for 
the noise.

Michael

>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Michael Foord 
> <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk <mailto:fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk>> wrote:
>
>     Issue 22239 has been closed as 'by design'.
>
>     http://ironpython.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=22239&ProjectName=IronPython
>     <http://ironpython.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=22239&ProjectName=IronPython>
>
>     Dino described this as a serious bug when it was pointed out and
>     it is both extremely unintuitive and problematic - why should
>     separate scopes (modules) be linked this way when used from the
>     hosting API?
>
>     This seems like a very odd decision.
>
>     All the best,
>
>     Michael Foord
>
>     -- 
>     http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
>     http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Users mailing list
>     Users at lists.ironpython.com <mailto:Users at lists.ironpython.com>
>     http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>   


-- 
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog





More information about the Ironpython-users mailing list