[IronPython] 2.1 Branch in Codeplex Sources

[Vernon Cole]

"IronPython 3k"... does that mean that IPy 2.1 is targeted to be compatible
with CPython 2.6?
(Please say "yes"!)
--
Vernon Cole

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Dino Viehland <dinov at microsoft.com> wrote:

> Just one other comment on top of what Curt said.  You might more properly
> think of Main as IronPython 3k.  Main includes a ton of renames and other
> breaking made in Microsoft.Scripting.Core/System.Core that will end up in
> .NET 4.0.  We're still working on what we want to do for 2.1 (and input is
> always welcome of course) but our current thinking is that it will be API
> compatible w/ 2.0.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/ironpython-users/attachments/20081031/455daa17/attachment.html>