[IronPython] FePy SourceForge website updates

[Sylvain Hellegouarch]

> I am not saying Seo's choice of license was a bad one, but I don't know
> if it has a value by itself that's all. The question is not to please
> people but to convey the correct rights as well as the responsability
> you take as the provide for the piece of software. The MIT license is as
> easy to understand and does just that IMO ;)

Mind you it seems some people believe the public domain license such as
the MIT one is actually not a license:

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6225 via
http://programming.reddit.com/info/k9kl/comments

- Sylvain