[Inpycon] Proposal for holding next PyConIndia in NCR

qua non akshayaurora at gmail.com
Tue Nov 24 07:46:59 EST 2015


It looks like we forgot to share the doc for venue research till now, here
is the link to the doc.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1atc1XXbl-l-qE4rWO6fzxt_jElJNVcIOJzB79c416D4/edit#gid=0&vpid=A1


Shows the list of possible even use and their details
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1atc1XXbl-l-qE4rWO6fzxt_jElJNVcIOJzB79c416D4/edit#gid=0&vpid=A1

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:41 PM, qua non <akshayaurora at gmail.com> wrote:

> @amit the schedule outlined above is talks 20 minutes Plus 10 minutes of
> time between talks.
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Amit Sethi <amit.pureenergy at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> When we say shorter talks of 20 mins. Are we including the time for
>> questions and setting up as well. I think 20 minutes of speaking time is
>> fine but we should include some 10 minutes for questions, configuration etc
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Amit
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:21 AM, vijay kumar <vnbang2003 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for Dehli.
>>> Thanks PyDehli team for well planned proposal so whole community can
>>> review.
>>> I think it too early to decide on schedule , we should let selection
>>> committee take those call as they are one who will work closely with each
>>> proposer/submitter.
>>> One more point:
>>> We tried to have 3 keynote speaker this year but due to budget
>>> constraint we were not able to take decision on time. I would request you
>>> guys to see if we can fit 3 keynote speaker for 2016.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:14 AM, qua non <akshayaurora at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here is updated schedule based on 20 minute talks. Doc updated as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    08:00AM Breakfast
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    09:00AM - 9:15AM Introductions/Welcome
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    09:20AM - 10:10AM Keynote
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    10:10AM - 10:50AM Break (Expo Hall 210)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hall 1
>>>>
>>>> Hall 2
>>>>
>>>> Hall 3
>>>>
>>>> 10:50AM - 11:10AM Talk
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> 11:20AM - 11:40PM Talk
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> 11:50PM - 12:10PM Talk
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> 12:20PM - 012:50PM Talk
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> 01:00PM - 02:00PM Lunch
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> 02:00PM - 02:20PM Talk
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> 02:30PM - 02:50PM Talk
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> 03:00PM - 03:20PM Talk
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> Ditto
>>>>
>>>> 03:20PM - 03:50PM High Tea break
>>>>
>>>> 03:50PM - 04:30PM Panel Discussion
>>>>
>>>> 04:30PM - 05:30PM Lightning talks
>>>>
>>>> 05:30PM Conclusion/break networking
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:15 AM, PULKIT PAHWA <pulkitpahwa11 at gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me too to shorter talks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shorter talks means better talks, to the point material, better
>>>>> concentration of the listener.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Best Regards*
>>>>> *Pulkit Pahwa*
>>>>> *8130425877*
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:49 AM, mahanthesh hv <mantheshv at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 20  min talks is a good suggestion +1 from me
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards
>>>>>> mahanthesh hv
>>>>>> On Nov 19, 2015 8:40 AM, "Noufal Ibrahim KV" <noufal at nibrahim.net.in>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19 2015, Harsh Gupta wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > I suggest reducing the duration of the talks. Most of the talks at
>>>>>>> > PyCon were there to introduces a new tool or technique and 40
>>>>>>> minutes
>>>>>>> > is too long for that. More interested people can always look up
>>>>>>> > details on the internet or talk to the speaker personally. I was at
>>>>>>> > SciPy, Austin this summer. Except for the keynote speeches all the
>>>>>>> > talks at SciPy are of 20 minutes and it works pretty well for them.
>>>>>>> > Shorter talks will also allow more people to talk and I think this
>>>>>>> > will be good for everybody.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The suggestion is sensible. +1 from me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, in general, I'm in support of experimenting with things like
>>>>>>> schedules, talks, tracks etc. Things might go south but if we stick
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> "the way things always were", we'll never get better.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cordially,
>>>>>>> Noufal
>>>>>>> http://nibrahim.net.in
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Inpycon mailing list
>>>>>>> Inpycon at python.org
>>>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Inpycon mailing list
>>>>>> Inpycon at python.org
>>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Inpycon mailing list
>>>>> Inpycon at python.org
>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Inpycon mailing list
>>>> Inpycon at python.org
>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vijay
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Inpycon mailing list
>>> Inpycon at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> A-M-I-T S|S
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Inpycon mailing list
>> Inpycon at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/inpycon/attachments/20151124/59cdd5c5/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Inpycon mailing list