[Inpycon] Everybody Pays Policy
Anand B Pillai
anandpillai at letterboxes.org
Mon Sep 23 10:13:18 CEST 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 23 September 2013 10:39 AM, sankarshan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Anand Chitipothu
> <anandology at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://jessenoller.com/blog/2011/05/25/pycon-everybody-pays
>
> this states:
>
> "So, how does "everybody pays" play into this? In two ways. First,
> it helps hedge our risk, institutionally speaking. PyCon had a
> good/bad year in 2009 - good for the attendees, but horrendously
> bad financially. We made various commitments in 2008 just as the
> markets were peaking, and we lost a lot of money when everything
> went south. Since then, it has been our budget policy to make sure
> that our revenues will cover our hard costs even if there is a 15%
> dip in attendance and a 35% dip in sponsorship.
>
> Second, you may have guessed that the "everybody pays" policy
> allows us to pad the financial aid budget. This has the direct
> benefit of bringing more people to the conference, increasing the
> diversity of people attending, getting a larger proportion of the
> community together, etc."
>
>> At this year's PyCon India, some speakers were upset that they
>> have to pay for the conference. I think we should make this point
>> very clear from the beginning.
>
> In light of the above quote, why were speakers upset that they have
> to pay?
This article was written a while ago but was highlighted recently
when there were a few tweets about it. Also we don't officially
follow PSF policy blindly and make our own policies.
I think as we were not clear and forthright on this as PSF
was, there was a thinking that speakers need not pay. We have had
some discussions in the past on such lines, so to me it
is not surprising that there was such a feeling.
Please note that PSSI is an independent organization with its
own policies - we definitely use PSF policies as guidelines and
references but don't automatically subscribe to them. I hope
this is very clear.
>
>
- --
Regards,
- --Anand
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Software Architect/Consultant
anandpillai at letterboxes.org
Please note my updated email address <anandpillai at letterboxes.org>.
Kindly update your address books.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSP/geAAoJEMTxYeOp9eaoVhIH/joInu0gm/aR4oMrWSN+oA6t
+2CcBwY9IvqLgqyMp04m6zAUsU31XCE7LA/jcaU5KSzCeOJcvMaGnksRDd4MIAdU
HlnyvxFdEWrt9isvMAR4NdWjVi2Xx+Arw6/guPgTUx58/xYHJZvx7h060b07H2xA
zz8q5Gd/iJMoztbpmjQ8XEQgUxFbj6+pEv4ISCnjZC70r2qj5HvK7ltl+eUUyR36
Vct1dED3tG55lCjkt3H8fJTEBaL52B828TGwT6ek+5QOk4VV/YOVIq3iRtdzpS7Y
LwwUy+DAeVZffbvRHEwpfOHNnC1oiasbUxnO/3NB2ho2Kd8LIJEgYWsERIGTSvQ=
=VVmF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Inpycon
mailing list