[Inpycon] CFP draft for review

[Noufal Ibrahim]

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
abpillai at gmail.com> wrote:

> [..]
>
>>
>> Summary. (summary of your talk in less than 100 words).
>>
>> Description (describe your talk in detail for reviewers)
>>
>> I'm not quite happy with the the description of the "description"
>> field. Any suggestions?
>>
>
>  The current description looks fine to me. Actually you don't need
> a description of the description. Just do as follows.
>
> Description
>
> Outline (A detailed outline of your talk, for reviewers only)
> <textarea>
>
> Notes (Notes for reviewers, if any)
> <textarea>
>


Isn't this a little redundant? Why a separate notes field? We'll have one
box called "Description" or "Detailed outline" which contains the outline
along with notes for the reviewers.

-- 
~noufal
http://nibrahim.net.in
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/inpycon/attachments/20100611/0579de8e/attachment.html>