[Inpycon] Received the MOA
steve
steve at lonetwin.net
Mon Feb 22 08:37:27 CET 2010
On 02/22/2010 12:56 PM, satyaakam goswami wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
> <abpillai at gmail.com <mailto:abpillai at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:45 PM, satyaakam goswami
> <satyaakam at gmail.com <mailto:satyaakam at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves
> <lawgon at au-kbc.org <mailto:lawgon at au-kbc.org>> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 20 Feb 2010 7:38:57 pm Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> > > I received the MoA at my address just now and am
> heading over shortly to
> > > the GNUnify venue. I was a bit surprised though,
> weren't we also supposed
> > > to include the address proof alongwith the document ?
> or should we be
> > > mailing that directly to Kenneth ?
> >
> > You just have to sign the document. As for the address
> proof, you need
> > to mail a self attested copy directly to Kenneth. This is
> what I know.
> >
>
> yes - and my snail mail box is still empty
>
>
> we have kept our self attested address proof in the signed
> document envelope itself.
>
>
> Why ? Now, it un-necessarily does the rounds along with the MoA to
> others
> increasing the chance of loss or damage. I didn't understand this.
> I had told
> clearly to send the address proofs directly to Kenneth and only
> pass the MoA
> along the channel.
>
>
> ok we missied your point so what now do we need to send one more to
> Kenneth now ?
>
Don't worry about it, I haven't yet mailed the MoA further. I'll send the
documents separately to Kenneth and the MoA shall be on it's way to susmit today.
cheers,
- steve
--
random non tech spiel: http://lonetwin.blogspot.com/
tech randomness: http://lonehacks.blogspot.com/
what i'm stumbling into: http://lonetwin.stumbleupon.com/
More information about the Inpycon
mailing list