From ggtr@netcourrier.com Mon Jul 3 12:49:44 2000 From: ggtr@netcourrier.com (Guillaume Gautier) Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 13:49:44 +0200 Subject: [Idle-dev] Console version of IDLE possible? Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.0.20000703134253.00a92c60@mail.avenda.fr> Hi, I love IDLE, and would like to have this environnement on a laptop running linux but not X (not enough space on HD). Looking at the source as a novice programmer, i can't see if the fonctionnal code is very dependant of the Tk stuff. Should it be difficult to make a ncurses or whatever console-gui version of IDLE ? As anybody as tried something in this direction? From pf@artcom-gmbh.de Mon Jul 3 13:23:24 2000 From: pf@artcom-gmbh.de (Peter Funk) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 14:23:24 +0200 (MEST) Subject: [Idle-dev] Console version of IDLE possible? In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.0.20000703134253.00a92c60@mail.avenda.fr> from Guillaume Gautier at "Jul 3, 2000 1:49:44 pm" Message-ID: Hi, Guillaume Gautier schrieb: > I love IDLE, and would like to have this environnement on a laptop running > linux > but not X (not enough space on HD). > Looking at the source as a novice programmer, i can't see if the > fonctionnal code is very > dependant of the Tk stuff. > Should it be difficult to make a ncurses or whatever console-gui version of > IDLE ? > As anybody as tried something in this direction? Not AFAIK. That would be a rather challenging task, since the editor heavily depends on the Tk-Textwidget. Are you really sure, that you can't use X11 on your Linux Laptop? There are so many useful X11-apps out there, that it would be a pitty. I myself have a rather cheap 1998 Pentium-Notebook with a small (2 GB) HD. I ran SuSE Linux all the time on it. Works like a charme. A basic X11 setup with a simple window manager should not eat up too much space. Regards, Peter -- Peter Funk, Oldenburger Str.86, D-27777 Ganderkesee, Germany, Fax:+49 4222950260 office: +49 421 20419-0 (ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Str.8, D-28359 Bremen) From shapr@uab.edu Wed Jul 5 00:12:41 2000 From: shapr@uab.edu (Shae Erisson) Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 02:12:41 +0300 Subject: [Idle-dev] Making changes to IDLE References: <200006231613.LAA02286@cj20424-a.reston1.va.home.com> Message-ID: <39626F69.5BAA1DBF@uab.edu> Guido van Rossum wrote: > You have my blessing! Please call it idle-fork. I don't have the > time to do any of the interaction with sourceforge. The SF admins > should be able to copy the idle subtree of the Python project into > idle-fork so that you have a decent CVS history to start with! > > --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) Is this up yet? Also, I couldn't find extend.py in the CVS tree, is it still the way to extend IDLE, or have things changed in 0.6? -- sHae mAtijs eRisson (sHae@wEbwitchEs.coM) gEnius fOr hIre From guido@beopen.com Thu Jul 6 16:54:28 2000 From: guido@beopen.com (Guido van Rossum) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 10:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Idle-dev] Making changes to IDLE In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Jul 2000 02:12:41 +0300." <39626F69.5BAA1DBF@uab.edu> References: <200006231613.LAA02286@cj20424-a.reston1.va.home.com> <39626F69.5BAA1DBF@uab.edu> Message-ID: <200007061554.KAA13607@cj20424-a.reston1.va.home.com> > Is this up yet? That's up to whoever wanted to do it. > Also, I couldn't find extend.py in the CVS tree, is it still the way to > extend IDLE, or have things changed in 0.6? Things have indeed changed -- it's now done through the configuration mechanism. See config.txt. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://dinsdale.python.org/~guido/) From ken@kenkinder.com Fri Jul 7 07:02:08 2000 From: ken@kenkinder.com (Ken Kinder) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 00:02:08 -0600 (MDT) Subject: [Idle-dev] Console version of IDLE possible? In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.0.20000703134253.00a92c60@mail.avenda.fr> Message-ID: I'd go with jed or emacs for that. -- Ken Kinder www.kenkinder.com On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Guillaume Gautier wrote: > Hi, > > I love IDLE, and would like to have this environnement on a laptop running > linux > but not X (not enough space on HD). > Looking at the source as a novice programmer, i can't see if the > fonctionnal code is very > dependant of the Tk stuff. > Should it be difficult to make a ncurses or whatever console-gui version of > IDLE ? > As anybody as tried something in this direction? > > > _______________________________________________ > IDLE-dev mailing list > IDLE-dev@python.org > http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/idle-dev > From montagne@BOORA.com Tue Jul 11 18:30:43 2000 From: montagne@BOORA.com (Montagne, Michael) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 10:30:43 -0700 Subject: [Idle-dev] No calltips Message-ID: I'm not receiving call tips. Below is what I have and there is no tip displayed. What have I done wrong? Winnt4.0 Python 1.5.2 (#0, Apr 13 1999, 10:51:12) [MSC 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Copyright 1991-1995 Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam >>> import win32api >>> import string >>>def divisible(numlist, divisor): for num in numlist: if not num % divisor: return num >>> divisible( thanks, mjm From shapr@uab.edu Tue Jul 11 22:26:13 2000 From: shapr@uab.edu (Shae Erisson) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:26:13 +0300 Subject: [Idle-dev] No calltips References: Message-ID: <396B90F5.52A21CF9@uab.edu> "Montagne, Michael" wrote: > > I'm not receiving call tips. Below is what I have and there is no tip > displayed. What have I done wrong? Most likely cause is that you don't have a docstring in divisible. Calltips for functions that I have defined come from the docstring. Second most likely cause is that you're not running a version of IDLE that supports calltips. -- shae matijs erisson (sHae@wEbwitchEs.coM) programmeur-savant