From john at paulett.org Wed Jul 13 05:10:41 2011 From: john at paulett.org (John Paulett) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:10:41 -0500 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 Message-ID: All, Just released v0.2.0 of python-hl7, a simple parsing library that converts HL7 messages into list-based Python data structures. v0.2.0 includes: - New documentation: http://python-hl7.readthedocs.org/ - Migrated to github: https://github.com/johnpaulett/python-hl7 - API modifications, including support for non-ASCII HL7 messages and dict-syntax (e.g. "message['OBX']"). Changelog available at http://python-hl7.readthedocs.org/en/latest/changelog.html. There is no MLLP implementation yet (the network protocol), but I have had some ideas floating around my head for awhile now. Please let me know if you find any bugs or have any ideas. The library is still an extremely simplistic view of a complex standard, so there are definitely areas for improvement. John From bradallen137 at gmail.com Wed Jul 13 05:14:31 2011 From: bradallen137 at gmail.com (Brad Allen) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:14:31 -0500 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hey, thanks John. I'm glad to see the activity on that project. The docs look nice. Is there any area you would like volunteers to step forward and help with? On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:10 PM, John Paulett wrote: > All, > > Just released v0.2.0 of python-hl7, a simple parsing library that > converts HL7 messages into list-based Python data structures. > > v0.2.0 includes: > - New documentation: http://python-hl7.readthedocs.org/ > - Migrated to github: https://github.com/johnpaulett/python-hl7 > - API modifications, including support for non-ASCII HL7 messages and > dict-syntax (e.g. "message['OBX']"). > > Changelog available at > http://python-hl7.readthedocs.org/en/latest/changelog.html. > > There is no MLLP implementation yet (the network protocol), but I have > had some ideas floating around my head for awhile now. > > Please let me know if you find any bugs or have any ideas. ?The > library is still an extremely simplistic view of a complex standard, > so there are definitely areas for improvement. > > John > _______________________________________________ > Healthcare mailing list > Healthcare at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/healthcare > From Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net Wed Jul 13 08:10:50 2011 From: Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net (Karsten Hilbert) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:10:50 +0200 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:14:31PM -0500, Brad Allen wrote: > Hey, thanks John. I'm glad to see the activity on that project. The > docs look nice. Is there any area you would like volunteers to step > forward and help with? I wonder whether anyone would be interested in merging Luke Leightons extensions: https://github.com/lkcl/hl7.git Also, proper Debian packages would be great: For guidance on that the best contact would be the Debian Med mailing list at http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/ Thanks, Karsten (on behalf of the GNUmed project - www.gnumed.de) -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 From federico.caboni at crs4.it Wed Jul 13 13:16:44 2011 From: federico.caboni at crs4.it (Federico Caboni) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:16:44 +0200 Subject: [PyHealthcare] Python in Healthcare @ Europython 2011 Message-ID: <8738AF1A-37A4-4520-A4D0-C29B8505FC74@crs4.it> Hi all, you can find both slides and video of my Europython 2011 talk "Healthcare process management in Python: a use case" here: http://ep2011.europython.eu/conference/talks/healthcare-process-management-in-python-a-use-case I also suggest you to check Wesley Chun's talk "Using Python in software for the medical industry" http://ep2011.europython.eu/conference/talks/using-python-in-software-for-the-medical-industry -- Federico -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From federico.caboni at crs4.it Wed Jul 13 13:22:00 2011 From: federico.caboni at crs4.it (Federico Caboni) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:22:00 +0200 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: <20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> Message-ID: <4047A03F-31FA-466C-8308-04ED230A2AFA@crs4.it> > I wonder whether anyone would be interested in merging Luke > Leightons extensions: > > https://github.com/lkcl/hl7.git that's a 404 for me... -- Federico From Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net Wed Jul 13 13:31:54 2011 From: Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net (Karsten Hilbert) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:31:54 +0200 Subject: [PyHealthcare] python-hl7 0.2.0 / Europython 2011 In-Reply-To: <20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> Message-ID: <20110713113154.GO2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:10:50AM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > I wonder whether anyone would be interested in merging Luke > Leightons extensions: > > https://github.com/lkcl/hl7.git This is relevant in particular to the recently posted: [...] slides [...] of my Europython 2011 talk "Healthcare process management in Python: a use case" here: http://ep2011.europython.eu/conference/talks/healthcare-process-management-in-python-a-use-case" because the 54 sayeth: "we only have [HL7] v2" and "Mirth: [...] made in Java" Reason being that: https://github.com/lkcl/hl7.git offers code to turn Mirth XML into Python code and thereby provides parts of a HL7 v3 Parser. So, any takers ? Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 From Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net Wed Jul 13 13:40:14 2011 From: Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net (Karsten Hilbert) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:40:14 +0200 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: <4047A03F-31FA-466C-8308-04ED230A2AFA@crs4.it> References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <4047A03F-31FA-466C-8308-04ED230A2AFA@crs4.it> Message-ID: <20110713114014.GP2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Federico Caboni wrote: > > I wonder whether anyone would be interested in merging Luke > > Leightons extensions: > > > > https://github.com/lkcl/hl7.git > > that's a 404 for me... That'd likely be a git tree. This browses for me: https://github.com/lkcl/hl7 Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 From john at paulett.org Wed Jul 13 13:49:27 2011 From: john at paulett.org (John Paulett) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:49:27 -0500 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: <20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> Message-ID: I just submitted an ITP to package python-hl7 for Debian. A few things would need to happen to merge https://github.com/lkcl/hl7: - That repo is not a typical git/hg fork, but rather is a fresh git init based off of the 0.1.1 tar file. The changes would need to be rebased upon the mainline. - There are no unit tests that I can find (the ones that existed in the 0.1.1 code base are gone). I would ideally like to seem pretty high test coverage - It appears that 2k+ XML files from Mirth are included in the references/ folder. Mirth being an MPL license, I believe we need to discuss (at least document better) the impact of adding this to a BSD-licensed project. John On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:14:31PM -0500, Brad Allen wrote: > >> Hey, thanks John. I'm glad to see the activity on that project. The >> docs look nice. Is there any area you would like volunteers to step >> forward and help with? > > I wonder whether anyone would be interested in merging Luke > Leightons extensions: > > ? ? ? ?https://github.com/lkcl/hl7.git > > Also, proper Debian packages would be great: > > ? ? ? ?For guidance on that the best contact would be the > ? ? ? ?Debian Med mailing list at > > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/ > > Thanks, > Karsten > > (on behalf of the GNUmed project - www.gnumed.de) > -- > GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de > E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD ?4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 > _______________________________________________ > Healthcare mailing list > Healthcare at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/healthcare > From Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net Wed Jul 13 14:09:08 2011 From: Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net (Karsten Hilbert) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:09:08 +0200 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> Message-ID: <20110713120908.GS2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:49:27AM -0500, John Paulett wrote: > I just submitted an ITP to package python-hl7 for Debian. Thanks ! I CCed the Debian Med mailing list so the relevant people learn of this right away. > A few things would need to happen to merge https://github.com/lkcl/hl7: > - That repo is not a typical git/hg fork, but rather is a fresh git > init based off of the 0.1.1 tar file. The changes would need to be > rebased upon the mainline. > - There are no unit tests that I can find (the ones that existed in > the 0.1.1 code base are gone). I would ideally like to seem pretty > high test coverage > - It appears that 2k+ XML files from Mirth are included in the > references/ folder. Mirth being an MPL license, I believe we need to > discuss (at least document better) the impact of adding this to a > BSD-licensed project. I see. Obviously I don't know enough about that code. Does it parse the XML at runtime or once for creating Python code ? If the latter one could just not add the XML but only parse it and merge the output. Would that work ? Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 From Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net Wed Jul 13 15:16:34 2011 From: Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net (Karsten Hilbert) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:16:34 +0200 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: <20110713125349.GC5657@an3as.eu> References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713120908.GS2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713125349.GC5657@an3as.eu> Message-ID: <20110713131634.GB19924@hermes.hilbert.loc> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 02:53:49PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > A few things would need to happen to merge https://github.com/lkcl/hl7: > > > - That repo is not a typical git/hg fork, but rather is a fresh git > > > init based off of the 0.1.1 tar file. The changes would need to be > > > rebased upon the mainline. > > I'm not sure whether this is a burning issue if you just want to package > the current version. However, if this is a call for help we have Git > experts lurking on this list (not me personally). To straighten this out a bit: John is upstream for the original python-hl7 code. Luke (at lkcl/hl7) did some work to extend John's code on behalf of GNUmed. John's currently interested in packaging his hl7 code which has evolved since Luke took off. Since Luke did not invest in "properly" cloning John's git tree but decided to create his own as if this was entirely new code (no doubt for good reasons) it is basically upon Luke to tell and bring his code to John's tree. With Luke not seeming all too interested in this and the asking (on the python-healthcare list) for things needing doing I suggested someone might look at this. Surely, a git expert might be helpful in that. > > > - There are no unit tests that I can find (the ones that existed in > > > the 0.1.1 code base are gone). I would ideally like to seem pretty > > > high test coverage > > Hmmm, Unit tests would be a nice feature. In the ITP you are listed as > maintainer *and* upstream - so what about reimplementing these tests > into the new version? While this is also not urgent for packaging it > makes prefectly sense to profit from tests. It'd be entirely understandable if John did not desire to spend too much effort on that since AFAICT there hasn't been that good of a reason to remove them in Luke's code in the first place. > > > - It appears that 2k+ XML files from Mirth are included in the > > > references/ folder. Mirth being an MPL license, I believe we need to > > > discuss (at least document better) the impact of adding this to a > > > BSD-licensed project. > > > > I see. Obviously I don't know enough about that code. > > As far as I know BSD and MPL license are compatible. So just mentioning > this fact in the debian/copyright file should be sufficient. That's good to know. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 From john at paulett.org Wed Jul 13 15:17:27 2011 From: john at paulett.org (John Paulett) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:17:27 -0500 Subject: [PyHealthcare] Bug#633749: ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: <20110713125349.GC5657@an3as.eu> References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713120908.GS2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713125349.GC5657@an3as.eu> Message-ID: Andreas, Putting this under the Debian Med team sounds good to me. I have only worked with the Python Modules Team before, so I will review the policies you referenced o make sure I package it properly. I will send an RFS to the debian-med list when the package is ready for review. The git / unit test / license issues are something we need to resolve upstream (another developer made some significant changes awhile back, which we will try to merge back in). For now, I will package the "mainline" version (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/hl7). Thanks, John On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > thanks to Karsten for the forewarding! > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 02:09:08PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:49:27AM -0500, John Paulett wrote: >> >> > I just submitted an ITP to package python-hl7 for Debian. >> >> Thanks ! >> >> I CCed the Debian Med mailing list so the relevant people >> learn of this right away. > > In fact this was a good hint. ?John, I have no idea whether you know the > Debian Med project[1] but if you feel good with team maintaining your > ITPed package the Debian Med team would be happy to welcome you. ?In > case you like this idea please read the Debian Med policy[2] which explains > what this group maintenance means. > > For the moment I just added a paragraph about python-hl7 at the "Medical > data" section of our tasks pages[3]. > >> > A few things would need to happen to merge https://github.com/lkcl/hl7: >> > - That repo is not a typical git/hg fork, but rather is a fresh git >> > init based off of the 0.1.1 tar file. ?The changes would need to be >> > rebased upon the mainline. > > I'm not sure whether this is a burning issue if you just want to package > the current version. ?However, if this is a call for help we have Git > experts lurking on this list (not me personally). > >> > - There are no unit tests that I can find (the ones that existed in >> > the 0.1.1 code base are gone). ?I would ideally like to seem pretty >> > high test coverage > > Hmmm, Unit tests would be a nice feature. ?In the ITP you are listed as > maintainer *and* upstream - so what about reimplementing these tests > into the new version? ?While this is also not urgent for packaging it > makes prefectly sense to profit from tests. > >> > - It appears that 2k+ XML files from Mirth are included in the >> > references/ folder. ?Mirth being an MPL license, I believe we need to >> > discuss (at least document better) the impact of adding this to a >> > BSD-licensed project. >> >> I see. Obviously I don't know enough about that code. > > As far as I know BSD and MPL license are compatible. ?So just mentioning > this fact in the debian/copyright file should be sufficient. > > Kind regards and be assured that we will support your effort of > packaging python-hl7 > > ? ? ?Andreas. > > > [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med > [2] http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html > [3] http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/data > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > > From Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net Wed Jul 13 15:20:33 2011 From: Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net (Karsten Hilbert) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:20:33 +0200 Subject: [PyHealthcare] Bug#633749: ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713120908.GS2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713125349.GC5657@an3as.eu> Message-ID: <20110713132033.GD19924@hermes.hilbert.loc> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:17:27AM -0500, John Paulett wrote: > For now, I will package the > "mainline" version (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/hl7). That will be of value to GNUmed even without Luke's enhancements. Thanks, Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 From ron.duplain at gmail.com Wed Jul 13 15:45:52 2011 From: ron.duplain at gmail.com (Ron DuPlain) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:45:52 -0400 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: <20110713131634.GB19924@hermes.hilbert.loc> References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713120908.GS2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713125349.GC5657@an3as.eu> <20110713131634.GB19924@hermes.hilbert.loc> Message-ID: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 02:53:49PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> > > A few things would need to happen to merge https://github.com/lkcl/hl7: >> > > - That repo is not a typical git/hg fork, but rather is a fresh git >> > > init based off of the 0.1.1 tar file. ?The changes would need to be >> > > rebased upon the mainline. >> >> I'm not sure whether this is a burning issue if you just want to package >> the current version. ?However, if this is a call for help we have Git >> experts lurking on this list (not me personally). > > To straighten this out a bit: > > John is upstream for the original python-hl7 code. > > Luke (at lkcl/hl7) did some work to extend John's code on > behalf of GNUmed. > > John's currently interested in packaging his hl7 code which > has evolved since Luke took off. > > Since Luke did not invest in "properly" cloning John's git > tree but decided to create his own as if this was entirely > new code (no doubt for good reasons) it is basically upon > Luke to tell and bring his code to John's tree. > > With Luke not seeming all too interested in this and the > asking (on the python-healthcare list) for things needing > doing I suggested someone might look at this. > > Surely, a git expert might be helpful in that. Here's a properly based merge: https://github.com/rduplain/python-hl7 -Ron From Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net Wed Jul 13 15:57:30 2011 From: Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net (Karsten Hilbert) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:57:30 +0200 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713120908.GS2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713125349.GC5657@an3as.eu> <20110713131634.GB19924@hermes.hilbert.loc> Message-ID: <20110713135730.GE19924@hermes.hilbert.loc> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:45:52AM -0400, Ron DuPlain wrote: > > Since Luke did not invest in "properly" cloning John's git > > tree but decided to create his own as if this was entirely > > new code (no doubt for good reasons) it is basically upon > > Luke to tell and bring his code to John's tree. > > > > With Luke not seeming all too interested in this and the > > asking (on the python-healthcare list) for things needing > > doing I suggested someone might look at this. > > > > Surely, a git expert might be helpful in that. > > Here's a properly based merge: > https://github.com/rduplain/python-hl7 Brilliant, thanks ;-) Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 From andreas at an3as.eu Wed Jul 13 14:53:49 2011 From: andreas at an3as.eu (Andreas Tille) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:53:49 +0200 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: <20110713120908.GS2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713120908.GS2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> Message-ID: <20110713125349.GC5657@an3as.eu> Hi, thanks to Karsten for the forewarding! On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 02:09:08PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:49:27AM -0500, John Paulett wrote: > > > I just submitted an ITP to package python-hl7 for Debian. > > Thanks ! > > I CCed the Debian Med mailing list so the relevant people > learn of this right away. In fact this was a good hint. John, I have no idea whether you know the Debian Med project[1] but if you feel good with team maintaining your ITPed package the Debian Med team would be happy to welcome you. In case you like this idea please read the Debian Med policy[2] which explains what this group maintenance means. For the moment I just added a paragraph about python-hl7 at the "Medical data" section of our tasks pages[3]. > > A few things would need to happen to merge https://github.com/lkcl/hl7: > > - That repo is not a typical git/hg fork, but rather is a fresh git > > init based off of the 0.1.1 tar file. The changes would need to be > > rebased upon the mainline. I'm not sure whether this is a burning issue if you just want to package the current version. However, if this is a call for help we have Git experts lurking on this list (not me personally). > > - There are no unit tests that I can find (the ones that existed in > > the 0.1.1 code base are gone). I would ideally like to seem pretty > > high test coverage Hmmm, Unit tests would be a nice feature. In the ITP you are listed as maintainer *and* upstream - so what about reimplementing these tests into the new version? While this is also not urgent for packaging it makes prefectly sense to profit from tests. > > - It appears that 2k+ XML files from Mirth are included in the > > references/ folder. Mirth being an MPL license, I believe we need to > > discuss (at least document better) the impact of adding this to a > > BSD-licensed project. > > I see. Obviously I don't know enough about that code. As far as I know BSD and MPL license are compatible. So just mentioning this fact in the debian/copyright file should be sufficient. Kind regards and be assured that we will support your effort of packaging python-hl7 Andreas. [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med [2] http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html [3] http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/data -- http://fam-tille.de From andreas at an3as.eu Wed Jul 13 15:31:57 2011 From: andreas at an3as.eu (Andreas Tille) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:31:57 +0200 Subject: [PyHealthcare] Bug#633749: ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713120908.GS2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713125349.GC5657@an3as.eu> Message-ID: <20110713133157.GA8288@an3as.eu> Hi John, On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:17:27AM -0500, John Paulett wrote: > Putting this under the Debian Med team sounds good to me. I have only > worked with the Python Modules Team before, so I will review the > policies you referenced o make sure I package it properly. I will > send an RFS to the debian-med list when the package is ready for > review. I forgot to say: We are actually not competing with any other team about maintainers. If you feel comfortable in python-modules and are used to work in their repository that's fine as well. You can ask for sponsors here in any case, that's no problem at all. However, it might be a good idea to lurk on the Debian Med mailing list if you are working on free medical software (independently in what team python-hl7 finally will end up). > The git / unit test / license issues are something we need to resolve > upstream (another developer made some significant changes awhile back, > which we will try to merge back in). For now, I will package the > "mainline" version (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/hl7). I fully trust your insight in this topic. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de From john at paulett.org Thu Jul 14 00:21:16 2011 From: john at paulett.org (John Paulett) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:21:16 -0500 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: <20110713135730.GE19924@hermes.hilbert.loc> References:

<20110713061050.GA2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713120908.GS2372@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713125349.GC5657@an3as.eu> <20110713131634.GB19924@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20110713135730.GE19924@hermes.hilbert.loc> Message-ID: Ron, Thanks for taking the effort to rebase the changes. It looks like there were some directory changes on both sides that result in Luke's changes being deleted during the rebase. I will take a look at the code and see if I can re-integrate and provide some unit tests. Thanks everyone for the support. It looks like the debian package has been accepted. John On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:45:52AM -0400, Ron DuPlain wrote: > >> > Since Luke did not invest in "properly" cloning John's git >> > tree but decided to create his own as if this was entirely >> > new code (no doubt for good reasons) it is basically upon >> > Luke to tell and bring his code to John's tree. >> > >> > With Luke not seeming all too interested in this and the >> > asking (on the python-healthcare list) for things needing >> > doing I suggested someone might look at this. >> > >> > Surely, a git expert might be helpful in that. >> >> Here's a properly based merge: >> https://github.com/rduplain/python-hl7 > > Brilliant, thanks ;-) > > Karsten > -- > GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de > E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD ?4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST at lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster at lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110713135730.GE19924 at hermes.hilbert.loc > > From ron.duplain at gmail.com Thu Jul 14 00:44:15 2011 From: ron.duplain at gmail.com (Ron DuPlain) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:44:15 -0400 Subject: [PyHealthcare] ANN: python-hl7 0.2.0 In-Reply-To: References: