From ron.duplain at gmail.com Fri May 1 06:09:28 2009 From: ron.duplain at gmail.com (Ron DuPlain) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 00:09:28 -0400 Subject: [group-organizers] Mailing Lists: python.org, Google groups, or self-host? Message-ID: <2b485bad0904302109q260d712eg935af0fb6818201c@mail.gmail.com> Hi All: We had our first Charlottesville Python User Group earlier this month. I would like to hear if anyone has input on hosting mailing lists, specifically if they find a particular advantage to hosting @python.org, using Google groups, or self-hosting a mailing list (e.g. mailman installation). I don't notice any common trends, poking around the LocalUserGroups page. Also, to get a new @python.org list, is mailing postmaster at python.org still the way to go? http://mail.python.org/mailman/private/group-organizers/2007-December/000045.html I sent an email over a week ago, and haven't received a response. Thanks for your input, Ron http://pycho.us From jeff at taupro.com Fri May 1 10:31:32 2009 From: jeff at taupro.com (Jeff Rush) Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 03:31:32 -0500 Subject: [group-organizers] Mailing Lists: python.org, Google groups, or self-host? In-Reply-To: <2b485bad0904302109q260d712eg935af0fb6818201c@mail.gmail.com> References: <2b485bad0904302109q260d712eg935af0fb6818201c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <49FAB364.7030004@taupro.com> Ron DuPlain wrote: > > We had our first Charlottesville Python User Group earlier this month. Glad to hear it! > I would like to hear if anyone has input on hosting mailing lists, > specifically if they find a particular advantage to hosting > @python.org, using Google groups, or self-hosting a mailing list (e.g. > mailman installation). I don't notice any common trends, poking > around the LocalUserGroups page. The Dallas group uses my own server to host our lists, just due to my not knowing about hosting it on python.org. Nowadays I would host it there to provide long-term continuity and archives. The Google groups interface just seems awkward, to me and I know many others as well. Just my .02. > Also, to get a new @python.org list, is mailing postmaster at > python.org still the way to go? > http://mail.python.org/mailman/private/group-organizers/2007-December/000045.html > I sent an email over a week ago, and haven't received a response. Yes, that is the correct way. The mailing admin team has a backlog of such requests because (a) they are moving the mail server to a brand new box and (b) a key member of the team is resolving some health issues. Please give them time to work it out. Because of this delay, they are also looking at setting up an issue tracker, so that the submitter and the team can see the status of work requests and insure none fall through the crack. -Jeff From ron.duplain at gmail.com Fri May 1 16:53:04 2009 From: ron.duplain at gmail.com (Ron DuPlain) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:53:04 -0400 Subject: [group-organizers] Mailing Lists: python.org, Google groups, or self-host? In-Reply-To: <49FAB364.7030004@taupro.com> References: <2b485bad0904302109q260d712eg935af0fb6818201c@mail.gmail.com> <49FAB364.7030004@taupro.com> Message-ID: <2b485bad0905010753j469bf687u51a53e7abebc71e@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Jeff Rush wrote: > Ron DuPlain wrote: >> >> We had our first Charlottesville Python User Group earlier this month. > > Glad to hear it! > > >> I would like to hear if anyone has input on hosting mailing lists, >> specifically if they find a particular advantage to hosting >> @python.org, using Google groups, or self-hosting a mailing list (e.g. >> mailman installation). ?I don't notice any common trends, poking >> around the LocalUserGroups page. > > The Dallas group uses my own server to host our lists, just due to my not > knowing about hosting it on python.org. ?Nowadays I would host it there to > provide long-term continuity and archives. ?The Google groups interface just > seems awkward, to me and I know many others as well. ?Just my .02. > > That was essentially my thought as well. I use Google groups for other activities and like it, but I'm not sure everyone does. >> Also, to get a new @python.org list, is mailing postmaster at >> python.org still the way to go? >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/private/group-organizers/2007-December/000045.html >> I sent an email over a week ago, and haven't received a response. > > Yes, that is the correct way. ?The mailing admin team has a backlog of such > requests because (a) they are moving the mail server to a brand new box and > (b) a key member of the team is resolving some health issues. ?Please give > them time to work it out. ?Because of this delay, they are also looking at > setting up an issue tracker, so that the submitter and the team can see the > status of work requests and insure none fall through the crack. > > -Jeff > Sure, no problem. My best to (b). I just wanted to double-check that I went to the right place. Thanks for your input, Ron http://pycho.us From david.christian at gmail.com Tue May 5 17:11:26 2009 From: david.christian at gmail.com (David Christian) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:11:26 -0400 Subject: [group-organizers] Northeast User Group Leadership Summit Message-ID: <63940b00905050811g49a9a2bq495e393a3e7ff8b4@mail.gmail.com> Hi all, I thought I'd let you know about an event that occurred in Boston this past weekend. At its essence, the event was a gathering of user group leaders in order to share notes about running user groups. The entire site is here: http://neugsummit2009.pbworks.com/ You can see my blog entry about it here. http://tr.im/kxwO The attendees have been great so far about filling in the conference schedule with the notes they recorded from the events. I am hoping that someone at some point takes these notes and turns them into something more formal, but even now I think some of the topics are worth a read. Here is a direct link to the summaries: http://neugsummit2009.pbworks.com/Schedule Dave From david.christian at gmail.com Thu May 7 23:32:55 2009 From: david.christian at gmail.com (David Christian) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 17:32:55 -0400 Subject: [group-organizers] book raffles? Message-ID: <63940b00905071432j6cc4b4fekdbe471e662b6600a@mail.gmail.com> We give away books every month, but I find just doing pieces of paper in a hat kind of boring. Last time we used random.shuffle(), which worked okay but you had to assign everyone a number. I'm looking at more innovative ways to use python and random to select the book winner...any ideas? Here's the one I'm working on now. Have everybody interested in the book stand up. Then have the assign themselves to be either a 1 or a 0. If they're a 1, they raise their hand, and if they're a 0, they don't. Then we use random to pick either a 1 or a 0, and those who are not holding the correct sign sit down. This gets repeated n times (for our group, maybe 5) until there's a winner. If you have x books to give away, you could do maybe wait until your winner pool was less than or equal to x, and then have some sort of ordering algorithm after that, maybe _then_ use random.shuffle to select first, second, third place. My only concern with this is that it might take a little longer than I'd like. Anyone else do anything interesting with book raffles? Dave From david.christian at gmail.com Sun May 24 06:53:29 2009 From: david.christian at gmail.com (David Christian) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 00:53:29 -0400 Subject: [group-organizers] Hack nights? In-Reply-To: <6523e39a0905232034if071e3au7cef4346b50f193e@mail.gmail.com> References: <63940b00904160951y4b948734ve7599996acb13aaf@mail.gmail.com> <6523e39a0905232034if071e3au7cef4346b50f193e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <63940b00905232153r69cb55d5tee2818cc210b7ecf@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Catherine Devlin wrote: > In our region, the .NET user groups have been very active in > organizing GiveCamps - hacking weekends to produce software for > charities - and they tell me that this is a very energizing format, > something that really draws people in. ?I suspect that a series of, > say, monthly hack nights for a cause would work as well - or better > (getting the projects to completion in one weekend is apparently the > hard part). > That format sounds wonderful! Thanks for letting us know about it! Yes, I can imagine getting any project to complete in one weekend is very difficult. To answer my own question a bit, I've now run a single hack night (not exactly a wealth of experience but it's a start) and here's what I've learned: * Three hours is enough to feel like you've accomplished _something_ even if it includes setup time and a break. It definitely whets the appetite for more. * After I wrote the initial email, I spoke to the Portland Python group via irc - members there recommended pair programming. Pair programming was a mixed success. In general I think it's better than the alternative, which is someone not being able to find their way and feeling disconnected from the group. * Of course one thing to keep in mind are the key details like power strips - it would suck to realize too late that you don't have a way to get people power! * I tried to get people to agree to projects before the meeting, given that we would only have 3 hours to have and there were a mere 7 of us. What I found worked better for that size group was simply to _talk_ about the ideas and then let the actual selection occur as people showed up. Having an idea of what was on the table was enough and acted as a shorthand for actual project selection. * At the portland hack night (which is actually run by an XP Programming group if I understand correctly) they actually do things a little differently. At the designated starting time, people promote their particular project and pick a section of the room as their own. People migrate to the ones they are interested in, and then people are divided into teams. * I think there are some XP ideas that map very well to hack nights. First, it works very well to have a "customer" - someone to resolve all disputes about what features are necessary. I hope it's clear how that might keep programming the focus. Secondly, that customer (generally the project proposer) should be prepared with small, iterable chunks of the project to work on so that work can be doled out as necessary. * The size of the hack night you can get is somewhat limited by the number of experienced programmers you can get. It could be a very unsuccessful hack night if you had all people with no experience show up. Best is to stack the deck with passionate programmers and then let the mixture of others to fill in the gaps. Although I think a hack night where _all_ the people involved were relatively expert would also be great. * In Portland apparently they considered iterations to be in 40 minute increments; after 40m everyone on a team would get back together and discuss what they'd done, direction would be reconsidered and people would be assigned new tasks. With our small size that wasn't necessary and would have been a distraction - everyone knew what everyone else was doing. * They also mentioned that determine python version, scm tool, etc, could be an expensive part of the setup, and eat up a considerable amount of time you'd prefer to be hacking. Eventually some groups created startup kits just for hacking. (They had hack nights for several months - 2 months they'd do them just on a week night, and then once a quarter they'd have longer saturday hack days.) * All in all, I'd say the hack night fulfilled my wishes, which was a set of time dedicated to a project that was not work related, in an environment that was setup to encourage focusing on that project, and that gave me a chance to share the fruits of my (and others) labor. Their cost is very low, so I highly recommend setting one up, even if you can only fit 6-8 people. That's the advice I remember. I'm hoping to do a much larger hack night that is django focused over the next few months - I will try to remember to report back. Cheers, Dave NYC Python Organizer > I'm hoping to go to one to see and model it, but it looks like there > won't be one near me until July. ?You could check at givecamp.org for > one around you. > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:51 PM, David Christian > wrote: >> Hey all, >> There was some discussion of hack nights when we were at pycon. >> >> I'm looking at starting such a thing here in NYC and so I wanted to >> keep that conversation going. >> >> I think the trickiest thing w/ hack nights is how to get things going >> - do you have one large project, or do you have lots of people doing >> their own projects? >> >> The details of making this work correctly I think are more tricky than >> they might seem, and it seems like it would be easy for a hack night >> to either devolve into everyone working on their own thing (I've seen >> this) or having it die when interest in a particular project dies >> (I've seen this too!) >> >> Any advice would be appreciated! >> >> Cheers, >> Dave >> NYCPython.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Group-Organizers mailing list >> Group-Organizers at python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/group-organizers >> > > > > -- > - Catherine > http://catherinedevlin.blogspot.com/ > *** PyOhio * July 25-26, 2009 * pyohio.org *** > From catherine.devlin at gmail.com Sun May 24 05:34:02 2009 From: catherine.devlin at gmail.com (Catherine Devlin) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 23:34:02 -0400 Subject: [group-organizers] Hack nights? In-Reply-To: <63940b00904160951y4b948734ve7599996acb13aaf@mail.gmail.com> References: <63940b00904160951y4b948734ve7599996acb13aaf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <6523e39a0905232034if071e3au7cef4346b50f193e@mail.gmail.com> In our region, the .NET user groups have been very active in organizing GiveCamps - hacking weekends to produce software for charities - and they tell me that this is a very energizing format, something that really draws people in. I suspect that a series of, say, monthly hack nights for a cause would work as well - or better (getting the projects to completion in one weekend is apparently the hard part). I'm hoping to go to one to see and model it, but it looks like there won't be one near me until July. You could check at givecamp.org for one around you. On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:51 PM, David Christian wrote: > Hey all, > There was some discussion of hack nights when we were at pycon. > > I'm looking at starting such a thing here in NYC and so I wanted to > keep that conversation going. > > I think the trickiest thing w/ hack nights is how to get things going > - do you have one large project, or do you have lots of people doing > their own projects? > > The details of making this work correctly I think are more tricky than > they might seem, and it seems like it would be easy for a hack night > to either devolve into everyone working on their own thing (I've seen > this) or having it die when interest in a particular project dies > (I've seen this too!) > > Any advice would be appreciated! > > Cheers, > Dave > NYCPython.org > _______________________________________________ > Group-Organizers mailing list > Group-Organizers at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/group-organizers > -- - Catherine http://catherinedevlin.blogspot.com/ *** PyOhio * July 25-26, 2009 * pyohio.org ***