From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Oct 13 08:33:26 2012
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:33:26 -0700
Subject: [Expat-bugs] [ expat-Bugs-3576997 ] c99 errors
Message-ID: <3Xdx201vlMzR61@mail.python.org>

Bugs item #3576997, was opened at 2012-10-12 23:33
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by 
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110127&aid=3576997&group_id=10127

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Build control
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: James Michael DuPont ()
Assigned to: Greg Stein (gstein)
Summary: c99 errors

Initial Comment:
gcc -I./lib -I. -std=c99 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -fexceptions  -DHAVE_EXPAT_CONFIG_H -o xmlwf/unixfilemap.o -c xmlwf/unixfilemap.c
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c: In function ?filemap?:
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:54: error: ?caddr_t? undeclared (first use in this function)
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:54: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:54: error: for each function it appears in.)
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:54: error: expected ?)? before numeric constant
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:55: error: too few arguments to function ?mmap?
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:62: error: expected ?)? before ?p?
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:62: error: too few arguments to function ?munmap?
make: *** [xmlwf/unixfilemap.o] Error 1

patch will be coming.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110127&aid=3576997&group_id=10127

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Oct 13 08:46:02 2012
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:46:02 -0700
Subject: [Expat-bugs] [ expat-Bugs-3576997 ] c99 errors
Message-ID: <3XdxJX2fL8zR69@mail.python.org>

Bugs item #3576997, was opened at 2012-10-12 23:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by 
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110127&aid=3576997&group_id=10127

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Build control
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: James Michael DuPont ()
Assigned to: Greg Stein (gstein)
Summary: c99 errors

Initial Comment:
gcc -I./lib -I. -std=c99 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -fexceptions  -DHAVE_EXPAT_CONFIG_H -o xmlwf/unixfilemap.o -c xmlwf/unixfilemap.c
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c: In function ?filemap?:
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:54: error: ?caddr_t? undeclared (first use in this function)
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:54: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:54: error: for each function it appears in.)
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:54: error: expected ?)? before numeric constant
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:55: error: too few arguments to function ?mmap?
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:62: error: expected ?)? before ?p?
xmlwf/unixfilemap.c:62: error: too few arguments to function ?munmap?
make: *** [xmlwf/unixfilemap.o] Error 1

patch will be coming.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: James Michael DuPont ()
Date: 2012-10-12 23:46

Message:
patch :
Index: xmlwf/unixfilemap.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/expat/expat/xmlwf/unixfilemap.c,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -r1.9 unixfilemap.c
19a20,21
> typedef __caddr_t caddr_t;
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110127&aid=3576997&group_id=10127