[EuroPython] EPC 2005: where and when?

[Beatrice Fontaine]

On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 15:35, Michael Hudson wrote:

[snip]

>  Connected to that is the question as to whether
> > we continue using Plone - before we even begin working on the site.
> > There obviously was disagreement on that too and it would be very useful
> > to get that aspect dealt with asap.
> 
> Well, that very much depends on who does the work.  I would hope that
> now there's a bit more (hurredly acquired...) plone experience around,
> working with next year's site would be easier than this year's was.
> 
> I'm also looking for less, not more, involvement on my part...

I think everyone shares that feeling, actually. The whole intention
behind the choice had obviously been that the content should be, as a
matter of course, truly worked on by all those involved, and that turned
out to be more complicated than planned for a variety of reasons - one
never ceases to learn. However, since the site survived the first
onslaught last year, I think that we should

either

1) keep what's there and improve on it asap

or

2) suggest another solution, making sure that there is actual support
for that solution among those who will have to use it

or

3) update the existing site while someone is cooking up something
better, because the outdated content on the existing site should be got
rid of rather sooner than later.

What do you all think?

cheers

bea



-- 
bea at webwitches.com
"My agenda is so hidden that I can't find it myself". Me.