[docs] [issue35651] PEP 257 (active) references PEP 258 (rejected) as if it were active

[Guido van Rossum]

Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> added the comment:

A rejected PEP still exists in perpetuity, and can still be used as a reference. Also, the reason for PEP 258's rejection is not that it is invalid, but that it's not slated for stdlib inclusion. So I think that the reference is still useful, and I don't think there's anything that needs to be done here.

----------
resolution:  -> wont fix
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35651>
_______________________________________