[docs] [issue27741] datetime.datetime.strptime functionality description incorrect
Tal Einat
report at bugs.python.org
Fri Oct 19 02:46:29 EDT 2018
Tal Einat <taleinat at gmail.com> added the comment:
I agree with Gus, such new wording would be great. Gus, would you like to make a PR?
I'd split the comparison into a second paragraph, and avoid the word "better", instead using something like "but datetime.strptime() also retains both microseconds and timezone data."
Note that such a change of the wording to "similar" rather than "equivalent" will also future-proof this wording from minor future changes to either function.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27741>
_______________________________________
More information about the docs
mailing list