[docs] [issue4395] Document auto __ne__ generation; provide a use case for non-trivial __ne__

[Martin Panter]

Martin Panter added the comment:

Nick seemed to approve of this, so perhaps it is ready to commit? The new patch just resolves a minor conflict with the current code.

----------
stage: patch review -> commit review
versions: +Python 3.6
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39954/default-ne-reflected-priority.v3.patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4395>
_______________________________________