[docs] [issue14616] subprocess docs should mention pipes.quote/shlex.quote
Ezio Melotti
report at bugs.python.org
Thu Oct 25 19:44:08 CEST 2012
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
> I think patch for 3.3 should mention only shlex.quote.
+1
I'm not sure what's the best thing to do about pipes.quote. Pointing to an undocumented function that is available in 3.3 in a different module doesn't sound like a really good idea.
Maybe we could document pipes.quote as an internal/deprecated function so that people that follow the link from the subprocess docs will be aware that the function is available under a different name in 3.3+.
Otherwise we could just document shlex.quote() in 3.3+.
----------
nosy: +ezio.melotti
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14616>
_______________________________________
More information about the docs
mailing list